Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research
- PMID: 36171611
- PMCID: PMC9516823
- DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-01031-6
Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research
Abstract
Background: Recent studies using mass drug administration (MDA) of antibiotics to entire communities have focused global attention on the unique ethical challenges of MDA of antibiotics in research and public health interventions. However, there is no specific guidance for Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review such trials. We surveyed the literature to identify the unique ethical challenges and to strengthen the competencies of RECs or IRBs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their ethical reviews of these trials.
Methods: We employed a desk review. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, combining terms for "mass drug administration" with terms for "research ethics committees," "institutional review boards," and "ethics." We reviewed citations of search results to retrieve additional articles. Only articles published and indexed in the above databases up to 6 January 2022 in English were included. Abstracts (without full articles), books and articles that had exclusive veterinary and environmental focus were excluded. We synthesized the literature to identify particularly challenging ethical issues relevant to antibacterial MDA trials in LMICs.
Results: The most challenging ethical issues can be categorised into four broad domains: determining the social value of MDA, assessing risks and benefits, engaging all stakeholders meaningfully, and study design-related ethical challenges. These four domains interact and impact each other. Together, they reveal the need for RECs/IRBs to review MDA studies through a broader lens than that of clinical trials per se. From our findings, we propose a framework to guide the RECs and IRBs in LMICs to perform the initial and continuing review of antibiotic MDA trials. We also recommend strengthening the competencies of LMIC RECs or IRBs through ongoing training and collaboration with RECs or IRBs from high-income countries.
Conclusions: REC/IRB review of research using MDA of antibiotics plays a critical role in assuring the ethical conduct of MDA studies. Local RECs/IRBs should be empowered to review MDA studies comprehensively and competently in order to advance scientific knowledge about MDA and promote improved global health.
Keywords: Antibiotic; Empowerment; Ethics Review; Ethics Review Committee; Guidance; Institutional Review Board; Mass drug administration; Trials.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Ethical challenges in mass drug administration for reducing childhood mortality: a qualitative study.Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Sep 16;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01023-6. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022. PMID: 36114588 Free PMC article.
-
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x. Dev World Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19046258
-
Ethical challenges in global research on health system responses to violence against women: a qualitative study of policy and professional perspectives.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01034-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 38504254 Free PMC article.
-
Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 17;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0409-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31623624 Free PMC article.
-
Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):169-84. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575511. Epub 2015 Mar 6. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25819759 Review.
References
-
- 5.Standardization WECoB. Human challenge trials for vaccine development: regulatory considerations. Annex 10, TRS No 1004. 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources