Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep:10.2217/fvl-2022-0020.
doi: 10.2217/fvl-2022-0020. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

Relevance of cycle threshold values in mass screening by reverse-transcription-PCR during COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a decision-making support?

Affiliations

Relevance of cycle threshold values in mass screening by reverse-transcription-PCR during COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a decision-making support?

Patrice Dufour et al. Future Virol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: The Belgium's strategy against COVID-19 was partly based on mass screening. Here, we reported the results observed in a Belgian mass screening center. Materials & methods: Between October 2020 and February 2021, 32,089 samples were collected analyzed with reverse-transcription PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific kits and apparatus). Patients were categorized according to their contagiousness (extrapolated from the cycle threshold [Ct] values and the recommendation of Sciensano). Results: We observed association between Ct values and age, with higher Ct observed in extreme age groups (<6 years and >75 years). Conclusion: The analysis of the evolution of the contagiousness of these patients tested twice within a 7-day period showed the relevancy of the recommendation edited by Sciensano.

Keywords: COVID-19; epidemiology; mass screening; reverse-transcription PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Algorithm for the management of patient tested by reverse-transcription PCR according to the Sciensano’s recommendations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cycle threshold value distribution among the studied population.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cycle threshold values according to age group.
Pairwise comparisons between groups were performed by using Kruskal–Wallis test. Significant differences were highlighted in bold (p < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Cycle threshold value distribution according to age.
Red represents the curve (95% CI in grey) of the polynomial model computed to assess relation between Ct values and individual age. Ct: Cycle threshold.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Alluvial plot illustrating the dynamics of contagiousness of patients tested twice within 7 days and with at least one positive test during this 7-day period.

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 situation update worldwide, as of week 22, updated 9 June 2022. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases
    1. Han MS, Byun J-H, Cho Y, Rim JH. RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: quantitative versus qualitative. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21(2), 165 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu F, Yan L, Wang N et al. Quantitative detection and viral load analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in infected patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71(15), 793–798 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singanayagam A, Patel M, Charlett A et al. Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020. Eurosurveillance 25(32), 2001483 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullard J, Dust K, Funk D et al. Predicting infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from diagnostic samples. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71(10), 2663–2666 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources