Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Dec:21:15330338221118983.
doi: 10.1177/15330338221118983.

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer

Yongqing Zhao et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) represents one of the most detrimental complications after colorectal surgery. The patient-related factors and surgery-related factors leading to AL have been identified in previous studies. Through early identification and timely adjustment of risk factors, preventive measures can be taken to reduce potential AL. However, there are still many problems associated with AL. The debate about preventive measures such as preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), intraoperative drainage, and surgical scope also continues. Recently, the gut microbiota has received more attention due to its important role in various diseases. Although the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota on AL have not been validated completely, new strategies that manipulate intrinsic mechanisms are expected to prevent and treat AL. Moreover, laboratory examinations for AL prediction and methods for blood perfusion assessment are likely to be promoted in clinical practice. This review outlines possible risk factors for AL and suggests some preventive measures in terms of patient, surgery, and gut microbiota.

Keywords: anastomotic leakage; colorectal cancer; gut microbiota; prevention; risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preventive measures for anastomotic leak (AL) in terms of patient, surgery, and gut microbiota.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The possible mechanisms of gut microbiota on anastomotic leak (AL). The altered phenotype makes the strain aggressive and virulent, activating MMP-9 and PLG, causing collagen degradation and AL. Besides, low microbiota diversity and decreased beneficial microbiota may reduce the proliferation and migration of ROS-mediated epithelial cells, thereby delaying anastomotic healing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Rutegård M. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open. 2019;3(1):106-111. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jutesten H, Buchwald P, Angenete E, Rutegard M, Lydrup ML. High risk of low anterior resection syndrome in long-term follow-up after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;65(10):1264-1273. doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000002334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ha GW, Kim JH, Lee MR. Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(11):3289-3299. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5881-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery. 2010;147(3):339-351. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms