Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):3133-3139.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.9.3133.

A Distributed Cancer Care Model with a Technology-Driven Hub-and-Spoke and further Spoke Hierarchy: Findings from a Pilot Implementation Programme in Kerala, India

Venkataramanan Ramachandran  1   2 , Akash Pradhan  2 , Abhishek Kumar  2 , Bharat Kumar Sarvepalli  2 , Sripriya Rao  2 , Kunal Oswal  2 , Raja Shekhar Kommu  2 , Manish Sharma  2 , Sarika Pathak  2 , Ramdas Kunnambath  2 , Moni Abraham Kuriakose  2 , Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy  2 , Mohannad Alajlani  1 , Theodoros N Arvanitis  1
Affiliations

A Distributed Cancer Care Model with a Technology-Driven Hub-and-Spoke and further Spoke Hierarchy: Findings from a Pilot Implementation Programme in Kerala, India

Venkataramanan Ramachandran et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Background: The technology enabled distributed model in Kerala is based on an innovative partnership model between Karkinos Healthcare and private health centers. The model is designed to address the barriers to cancer screening by generating demand and by bringing together the private health centers and service providers at various levels to create a network for continued care. This paper describes the implementation process and presents some preliminary findings. Methods: The model follows the hub-and-spoke and further spoke framework. In the pilot phases, from July 2021 to December 2021, five private health centers (partners) collaborated with Karkinos Healthcare across two districts in Kerala. Screening camps were organized across the districts at the community level where the target groups were administered a risk assessment questionnaire followed by screening tests at the spoke hospitals based on a defined clinical protocol. The screened positive patients were examined further for confirmatory diagnosis at the spoke centers. Patients requiring chemotherapy or minor surgeries were treated at the spokes. For radiation therapy and complex surgeries the patients were referred to the hubs.

Results: A total of 2,459 individuals were screened for cancer at the spokes and 299 were screened positive. Capacity was built at the spokes for cancer surgery and chemotherapy. A total of 189 chemotherapy sessions and 17 surgeries were performed at the spokes for cancer patients. 70 patients were referred to the hub.

Conclusion: Initial results demonstrate the ability of the technology Distributed Cancer Care Network (DCCN) system to successfully screen and detect cancer and to converge the actions of various private health facilities towards providing a continuum of cancer care. The lessons learnt from this study will be useful for replicating the process in other States.

Keywords: COVID-19; India; access; cancer; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Distributed Cancer Care Model, Powered by Technology Platform
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adab P, McGhee SM, Yanova J, Wong CM, Hedley AJ. Effectiveness and efficiency of opportunistic cervical cancer screening comparison with organized screening. Med Care. 2004;42:600–9. - PubMed
    1. Bretthauer M, Kalager M. Principles, effectiveness and caveats in screening for cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:55–65. - PubMed
    1. Chaturvedi M, Vaitheeswaran K, Satishkumar K, et al. Time trends in breast cancer among Indian women population: An analysis of population based cancer registry data. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6:427–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Tuzzio L, Greene SM. Improving modern cancer care through information technology. Am J Prev Med. 2011:40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dsouza NDR, Murthy NS, Aras RY. Projection of burden of cancer mortality for india, 2011-2026. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013a;14:4387–92. - PubMed