Good theoretical debate, but insufficient proof of concept
- PMID: 36172762
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22000140
Good theoretical debate, but insufficient proof of concept
Abstract
Bruineberg and colleagues argue that the patellar reflex cannot be modeled sufficiently with a Friston blanket due to counterintuitive sensorimotor boundaries. Although I agree with their theoretical discussion, their model of the patellar reflex is insufficiently based on clinical knowledge. Consequently, this example should not be applied to challenge Friston blankets. I will provide an alternative example.
Comment in
-
The Emperor Is Naked: Replies to commentaries on the target article.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 29;45:e219. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000656. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36172792
Comment on
-
The Emperor's New Markov Blankets.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 22;45:e183. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21002351. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34674782
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
