Platelet preservation in cardiac surgery using minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation versus optimized cardiopulmonary bypass
- PMID: 36172835
- PMCID: PMC10612373
- DOI: 10.1177/02676591221130173
Platelet preservation in cardiac surgery using minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation versus optimized cardiopulmonary bypass
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) is employed as a strategy to attenuate the physiologic disturbance caused by cardiopulmonary bypass. The aim of this study was to compare the coagulation profile of MiECC to an optimized conventional extracorporeal circuit (OpECC) with regards to platelet function, rotational thromboelastometry and blood product usage.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting operations using either MiECC or OpECC was performed at a single institution.
Results: A total of 112 patients were included, with 61 receiving MiECC and 51 OpECC patients. OpECC patients had a significantly larger BSA (1.95+/- 0.22m2 vs 1.88 +/- 0.18m2, p = 0.034), than those who received MiECC. No difference between groups was observed regarding red blood cell, plasma, and platelet transfusions. Functional platelet count during the warming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass was found to be higher in the MiECC group ((136 (102-171) x109/L vs 109 (94-136) x109/L), p = 0.027), as were functional platelets as a percent of total platelet count ((86 (77-91)% vs 76 (63-82)%), p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between other outcomes such as operative mortality, incidence of stroke, and intensive care unit length of stay.
Conclusion: While we did not see a difference in blood transfusions, MiECC resulted in a statistically significant advantage over OpECC with regards to preservation of functional platelets.
Keywords: coagulation; extracorporeal circulation; mini-circuit; platelet function.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between hybrid system and MiECC: A prospective pilot study.J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025 Jun;57(2):74-81. doi: 10.1051/ject/2025001. Epub 2025 Jun 16. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025. PMID: 40523134 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation improves quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1196-1203. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw210. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27307483 Clinical Trial.
-
Gaseous Micro-Embolic Activity and Goal-Directed Perfusion Management in a Closed System for Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Surg Technol Int. 2023 Dec 15;43(146-152):sti43/1721. doi: 10.52198/23.STI.43.CV1721. Surg Technol Int. 2023. PMID: 37851305
-
Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 28;67(4):ezaf112. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf112. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40131383 Free PMC article.
-
Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation ensures perfusion safety and technical feasibility in cardiac surgery; a systematic review of the literature.Perfusion. 2022 Nov;37(8):852-862. doi: 10.1177/02676591211026514. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Perfusion. 2022. PMID: 34137323
References
-
- Gibbon JH., Jr. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 1954; 37(3). - PubMed
-
- Mcguinness J, Bouchier-Hayes D, Redmond J. Understanding the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery. The Surgeon 2008; 6(3): 162–171. - PubMed
-
- Bartoszko J, Karkouti K. Managing the coagulopathy associated with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 19(3): 617–632. - PubMed
-
- Anastasiadis K, Murkin J, Antonitsis P, et al. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: Principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). Interactive Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22(5): 647–662. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Haidich A-B, et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2013; 164(2): 158–169. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources