Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia for MRI: Results From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium
- PMID: 36173243
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28392
Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia for MRI: Results From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common imaging procedure requiring sedation/anesthesia in children. Understanding adverse events associated with sedation/anesthesia is important in making decisions regarding MRI vs. other imaging modalities. No large studies have evaluated the practice of pediatric sedation/anesthesia for MRI by a variety of pediatric specialists.
Purpose: Utilize a large pediatric sedation database to characterize the patients and adverse events associated with sedation/anesthesia for pediatric MRI.
Study type: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Subjects: The Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium (PSRC) has 109,947 entries for sedations for MRI from November 10, 2011 through December 18, 2017.
Assessment: Patient demographics, sedative medications, interventions, and adverse events are described. Associations with adverse events were assessed. Trends in sedative medications used over time are examined.
Statistical tests: Descriptive statistics, Chi-Squared and Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables, logistic regression and assessment of trend using logistic regression and other method.
Results: A total of 109,947 MRI-related sedations were examined. Most subjects (66.2%) were 5 years old or younger. Seizure or other neurologic issue prompted MRI in 63.7% of cases. Providers responsible for sedation/anesthesia included intensivists (49.3%), emergency medicine physicians (28.2%), hospitalists (10.2%), and anesthesiologists (9.8%). The most commonly used sedative agent was propofol (89.1%). The most common airway intervention was supplemental oxygen (71.7%), followed by head/airway repositioning (20.6%). Airway-related adverse events occurred in 8.4% of patients. Serious adverse events occurred in only 0.06% of patients, including three cases of cardiac arrest. No mortality was recorded. There was a statistically significant increase in the use of dexmedetomidine over time.
Data conclusions: Overall, adverse event rates were low. Sedation/anesthesia with propofol infusion and natural airway was the most common method used by this varied group of sedation providers. The use of dexmedetomidine increased over time.
Evidence level: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Keywords: adverse events; magnetic resonance imaging; pediatrics; sedation.
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
References
-
- Barton K, Nickerson JP, Higgins T, Williams RK. Pediatric anesthesia and neurotoxicity: What the radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48(1):31-36.
-
- Deen J, Vandevivere Y, Van de Putte P. Challenges in the anesthetic management of ambulatory patients in the MRI suites. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017;30(6):670-675.
-
- Uffman JC, Tumin D, Raman V, Thung A, Adler B, Tobias JD. MRI utilization and the associated use of sedation and anesthesia in a pediatric ACO. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14(7):924-930.
-
- Callahan MJ, MacDougall RD, Bixby SD, Voss SD, Robertson RL, Cravero JP. Ionizing radiation from computed tomography versus anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children: Patient safety considerations. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48(1):21-30.
-
- Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: Report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics 2006;118(3):1087-1096.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
