Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;26(11):2198-2209.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03508-0. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Maternal Immunization: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis of the Published Literature

Affiliations
Review

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Maternal Immunization: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis of the Published Literature

Sarah Geoghegan et al. Matern Child Health J. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccines are being developed against Group B Streptococcus and respiratory syncytial virus. These vaccines are designed to be given to pregnant women to protect infants; thus, their success depends on uptake in this population. Maternal immunization programs have struggled to achieve target coverage rates. This systematic narrative synthesis aims to define the most important barriers and facilitators for maternal immunization and to identify priority areas for future research.

Methods: A search strategy was developed in Medline and adapted according to the requirements of additional search engines. Two reviewers independently reviewed the studies, using pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results sections of included studies were coded, and thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes.

Results: 321 studies were included in the final review. Most studies came from North America (37%), Europe (26%) or East Asia, Australia and New Zealand (22%). Low-and middle-income countries were under-represented. Five percent of studies came from Sub-Saharan Africa, and 2% came from South Asia. The prominent factors impacting maternal immunization were provider recommendation, perceived risks and benefits of maternal vaccines for the infant, race, birthplace, and access to healthcare. Few studies explored reasons behind racial and socioeconomic disparities in maternal immunization rates.

Discussion: A strong provider recommendation, equitable access to prenatal care and messaging that focuses on vaccine safety and infant benefits emerged as the key components for optimising vaccine uptake among pregnant women. Research among healthcare providers, minority groups and in low- and-middle-income countries was lacking. In anticipation of the expansion of maternal immunization programmes, focused research is needed to address these gaps and inform a successful public health strategy.

Keywords: Global; Hesitancy; Maternal immunization; Pregnancy; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kristen Feemster is currently employed by Merck Research laboratories. Employment commenced after conceptualization of this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram for study selection showing both searches. The initial searchwhich took place on 02/13/2019 and a repeat Medline search on 1/19/2021
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Geographic distribution of included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Vaccines mentioned in included studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Interplay of factors influencing uptake of vaccines in pregnancy, grouped according to the SAGE working group’s determinants of vaccine hesitancy. formula image Contextual (sociodemographic/geo-political), formula image Individual and social group influences, formula image Vaccine specific uses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anatea MD, Mekonnen TH, Dachew BA. Determinants and perceptions of the utilization of tetanus toxoid immunization among reproductive-age women in Dukem Town, Eastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2018 doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0168-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnold LD, Luong L, Rebmann T, Chang JJ. Racial disparities in U.S. maternal influenza vaccine uptake: Results from analysis of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data, 2012–2015. Vaccine. 2019;37(18):2520–2526. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arriola CS, Suntarattiwong P, Dawood FS, Soto G, Das P, Hunt DR, Sinthuwattanawibool C, Kurhe K, Thompson MG, Wesley MG, Saha S, Tinoco YO. What do pregnant women think about influenza disease and vaccination practices in selected countries. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2021 doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1851536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barber A, Muscoplat MH, Fedorowicz A. Coverage with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine and influenza vaccine among pregnant women—Minnesota, March 2013–December 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 2017;66(2):56–59. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beigi RH, Fortner KB, Munoz FM, Roberts J, Gordon JL, Han HH, Glenn G, Dormitzer PR, Gu XX, Read JS, Edwards K, Swamy GK. Maternal immunization: Opportunities for scientific advancement. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2014;59:S408–S414. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu708. - DOI - PMC - PubMed