Treatment With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Up to 5 Oligometastases in Patients With Cancer: Primary Toxic Effect Results of the Nonrandomized Phase 2 SABR-5 Clinical Trial
- PMID: 36173619
- PMCID: PMC9523552
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4394
Treatment With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Up to 5 Oligometastases in Patients With Cancer: Primary Toxic Effect Results of the Nonrandomized Phase 2 SABR-5 Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: After the publication of the landmark SABR-COMET trial, concerns arose regarding high-grade toxic effects of treatment with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases.
Objective: To document toxic effects of treatment with SABR in a large cohort from a population-based, provincial cancer program.
Design, setting, and participants: From November 2016 to July 2020, 381 patients across all 6 cancer centers in British Columbia were treated in this single-arm, phase 2 trial of treatment with SABR for patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. During this period, patients were only eligible to receive treatment with SABR in these settings in trials within British Columbia; therefore, this analysis is population based, with resultant minimal selection bias compared with previously published SABR series.
Interventions: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to up to 5 metastases.
Main outcomes and measures: Rate of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR.
Findings: Among 381 participants (122 women [32%]), the mean (SD; range) age was 68 (11.1; 30-97) years, and the median (range) follow-up was 25 (1-54) months. The most common histological findings were prostate cancer (123 [32%]), colorectal cancer (63 [17%]), breast cancer (42 [11%]), and lung cancer (33 [9%]). The number of SABR-treated sites were 1 (263 [69%]), 2 (82 [22%]), and 3 or more (36 [10%]). The most common sites of SABR were lung (188 [34%]), nonspine bone (136 [25%]), spine (85 [16%]), lymph nodes (78 [14%]), liver (29 [5%]), and adrenal (15 [3%]). Rates of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR (based on the highest-grade toxic effect per patient) were 14.2%; (95% CI, 10.7%-17.7%), 4.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.2%), 0%, and 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-0.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or higher toxic effects associated with SABR at year 2 by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 8%, and for grade 3 or higher, 4%.
Conclusions and relevance: This single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial found that the incidence of grade 3 or higher SABR toxic effects in this population-based study was less than 5%. Furthermore, the rates of grade 2 or higher toxic effects (18.6%) were lower than previously published for SABR-COMET (29%). These results suggest that SABR treatment for oligometastases has acceptable rates of toxic effects and potentially support further enrollment in randomized phase 3 clinical trials.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02933242.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Comment in
-
Defining a Therapeutic Ratio for Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Disease-Another Piece of the Puzzle.JAMA Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;8(11):1650-1651. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4342. JAMA Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36173641 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases (SAFRON II): The Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 13.01 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1476-1485. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2939. JAMA Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34455431 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Survival Rates Associated With Ablative Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients With Oligometastatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):92-106. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6146. JAMA Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33237270 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147. JAMA Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32215577 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Population-based phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for up to 5 oligometastases: SABR-5.BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4859-7. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30286739 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The curative potential of stereotactic radiotherapy in oligometastatic colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Ann Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;14(2):172-188. doi: 10.21037/apm-24-170. Ann Palliat Med. 2025. PMID: 40211742 Review.
Cited by
-
Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2072. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052072. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902858 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival outcomes of pulmonary metastasis-directed local therapy in adenoid cystic carcinoma.Cancer. 2025 May 15;131(10):e35901. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35901. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40377125 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic TME is non-inferior.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec;19(12):748. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00695-1. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36202995 No abstract available.
-
Single-arm multicenter phase II study on aggressive local consolidative therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma with oligometastases: CURE-OLIGO (TORG1529).Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jan 4;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02577-5. Radiat Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39755666 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive and Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 May 31;12:1097-1110. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S519770. eCollection 2025. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025. PMID: 40470127 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Olson R, Senan S, Harrow S, et al. . Quality of life outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) versus standard of care treatments in the oligometastatic setting: a secondary analysis of the SABR-COMET randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(5):943-947. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.041 - DOI - PubMed