Clinical Approach to Assessing Acid-Base Status: Physiological vs Stewart

Abstract

Evaluation of acid-base status depends on accurate measurement of acid-base variables and their appropriate assessment. Currently, 3 approaches are utilized for assessing acid-base variables. The physiological or traditional approach, pioneered by Henderson and Van Slyke in the early 1900s, considers acids as H⁺ donors and bases as H⁺ acceptors. The acid-base status is conceived as resulting from the interaction of net H⁺ balance with body buffers and relies on the H₂CO₃/HCO₃^- buffer pair for its assessment. A second approach, developed by Astrup and Siggaard-Andersen in the late 1950s, is known as the base excess approach. Base excess was introduced as a measure of the metabolic component replacing plasma [HCO₃^-]. In the late 1970s, Stewart proposed a third approach that bears his name and is also referred to as the physicochemical approach. It postulates that the [H⁺] of body fluids reflects changes in the dissociation of water induced by the interplay of 3 independent variables-strong ion difference, total concentration of weak acids, and PCO₂. Here we focus on the physiological approach and Stewart's approach examining their conceptual framework, practical application, as well as attributes and drawbacks. We conclude with our view about the optimal approach to assessing acid-base status.

Keywords: Anion gap; Physicochemical approach; Physiological approach; Stewart's approach; Strong ion difference.