Changes in microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic shoulder infections
- PMID: 36175674
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04635-7
Changes in microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic shoulder infections
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major concern in shoulder arthroplasty, which in some cases require two-stage exchange. While it was shown that low-virulence bacteria are the most isolated pathogens in shoulder PJI, little is known about changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns during two-stage revision.
Methods: This retrospective study included all patients (n = 25) who received a two-stage revision from January 2011 to December 2020 for shoulder PJI in one institution. Microbiological spectrum, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and re-revision rates of culture positive first- and second-stage procedures were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 29.7 months (range 8; 115 months). At final follow-up, subjective shoulder value (SSV) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and satisfaction with the surgery were assessed.
Results: In 25 patients, a total of 54 2-stage exchange procedures were performed and positive cultures were obtained in 36 of these surgeries (66.7%). A total of 7 out of 25 patients (28.0%) showed a positive microbiological culture at first and second stages. In those patients, the mean time between first and second stages was 30.9 weeks (range 6; 70). Three out of those seven patients (42.9%) had a polymicrobial spectrum with one microorganism persistent at stage two, including Cutibacterium acnes (n = 1) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (n = 2). In all these cases, antimicrobial resistance patterns changed. All cultures with monomicrobial spectrum (n = 4) at first stage showed a changed spectrum. Patients with positive first- and second-stage revisions showed a mean SSV of 49.3% ± 23.5 versus 52.9% ± 29.5 in single positive patients (p = 0.76). Re-revision was performed in five cases, two of those in patients with positive first- and second-stage cultures.
Conclusion: There is a high rate of changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns between culture positive first- and second-stage procedures as well as subsequent re-revisions. Intraoperative samples during reimplantation should be taken and resistance reconsidered in case of re-revision.
Keywords: Microbiological spectrum; Resistance pattern; Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Akgun D, Maziak N, Plachel F et al (2020) The role of implant sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Akgun D, Wietholter M, Maziak N et al (2021) Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic shoulder infection is associated with high rate of failure to reimplant and mortality. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215186 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Akgun D, Wietholter M, Siegert P et al (2021) The role of serum C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03779-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Beekman PD, Katusic D, Berghs BM, Karelse A, De Wilde L (2010) One-stage revision for patients with a chronically infected reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92(6):817–822. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23045 - DOI
-
- Bonnevialle N, Dauzeres F, Toulemonde J, Elia F, Laffosse JM, Mansat P (2017) Periprosthetic shoulder infection: an overview. EFORT Open Rev 2(4):104–109. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160023 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
