Use of MFM-20 to monitor SMA types 1 and 2 patients treated with nusinersen
- PMID: 36175810
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06403-2
Use of MFM-20 to monitor SMA types 1 and 2 patients treated with nusinersen
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Use of MFM-20 to monitor SMA types 1 and 2 patients treated with nusinersen.Neurol Sci. 2023 Mar;44(3):1139. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06522-w. Neurol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36418612 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate sensitivity to change and discriminant validity of the 20-item Motor Function Measure (MFM-20) in 2-7-year-old patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 1 (SMA1) or 2 (SMA2) treated with nusinersen.
Methods: Children aged 2 to 7 years old with SMA1 or SMA2 treated with nusinersen were assessed at least three times using the MFM-20 over an average follow-up time of 17 months. Evolution of 4-month-standardized MFM-20 scores was calculated for each MFM-20 domain (D1 standing and transfers, D2 axial and proximal, D3 distal) and for the total score (TS).
Results: Included in the study were 22 SMA1 subjects and 19 SMA2 subjects. Baseline MFM scores were significantly lower in patients with SMA1 than SMA2 (TS 29.5% vs. 48.3%, D1 4.5% vs. 10.6%, D2 43.6% vs. 72.6%, D3 51.2% vs. 75.0%). When considering the mean change during nusinersen treatment, standardized over a 4-month period, TS was improved for both SMA1 (+ 4.1%, SRM 1.5) and SMA2 (+ 2.8%, SRM 0.89) patients. For SMA1 patients, considerable changes were observed in D2 (+ 6.2%, SRM 0.89) and D3 (+ 6.0%, SRM 0.72), whereas the change in D1 was small (+ 0.5%, SRM 0.44). In SMA2 2 subjects, D3 was improved to a larger extent (+ 4.2%, SRM 0.53) than D1 (+ 1.8% SRM 0.63) or D2 (+ 3.2%, SRM 0.69).
Conclusion: Our results validate use of MFM-20 to monitor function of young SMA1 and SMA2 subjects treated with nusinersen. Significant motor function improvements following treatment were observed in both SMA1 and SMA2 patients.
Keywords: Disability evaluation; MFM; Motor Function Measure; Outcome assessment; Responsiveness; Spinal muscular atrophy.
© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
References
-
- Mailman MD, Heinz JW, Papp AC, Snyder PJ, Sedra MS, Wirth B et al (2002) Molecular analysis of spinal muscular atrophy and modification of the phenotype by SMN2. Genet Med 4(1):20–26 - DOI
-
- Finkel R, Bertini E, Muntoni F, Mercuri E (2015) 209th ENMC International Workshop: outcome measures and clinical trial readiness in spinal muscular atrophy 7–9 November 2014, Heemskerk The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord 25(7):593–602 - DOI
-
- Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J et al (2017) Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 377(18):1723–1732 - DOI
-
- Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM et al (2018) Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 378(7):625–635 - DOI
-
- Baranello G, Darras BT, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Masson R et al (2021) Risdiplam in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 384(10):915–923 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
