Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;44(1):329-337.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06403-2. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Use of MFM-20 to monitor SMA types 1 and 2 patients treated with nusinersen

Affiliations

Use of MFM-20 to monitor SMA types 1 and 2 patients treated with nusinersen

Laure Le Goff et al. Neurol Sci. 2023 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate sensitivity to change and discriminant validity of the 20-item Motor Function Measure (MFM-20) in 2-7-year-old patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 1 (SMA1) or 2 (SMA2) treated with nusinersen.

Methods: Children aged 2 to 7 years old with SMA1 or SMA2 treated with nusinersen were assessed at least three times using the MFM-20 over an average follow-up time of 17 months. Evolution of 4-month-standardized MFM-20 scores was calculated for each MFM-20 domain (D1 standing and transfers, D2 axial and proximal, D3 distal) and for the total score (TS).

Results: Included in the study were 22 SMA1 subjects and 19 SMA2 subjects. Baseline MFM scores were significantly lower in patients with SMA1 than SMA2 (TS 29.5% vs. 48.3%, D1 4.5% vs. 10.6%, D2 43.6% vs. 72.6%, D3 51.2% vs. 75.0%). When considering the mean change during nusinersen treatment, standardized over a 4-month period, TS was improved for both SMA1 (+ 4.1%, SRM 1.5) and SMA2 (+ 2.8%, SRM 0.89) patients. For SMA1 patients, considerable changes were observed in D2 (+ 6.2%, SRM 0.89) and D3 (+ 6.0%, SRM 0.72), whereas the change in D1 was small (+ 0.5%, SRM 0.44). In SMA2 2 subjects, D3 was improved to a larger extent (+ 4.2%, SRM 0.53) than D1 (+ 1.8% SRM 0.63) or D2 (+ 3.2%, SRM 0.69).

Conclusion: Our results validate use of MFM-20 to monitor function of young SMA1 and SMA2 subjects treated with nusinersen. Significant motor function improvements following treatment were observed in both SMA1 and SMA2 patients.

Keywords: Disability evaluation; MFM; Motor Function Measure; Outcome assessment; Responsiveness; Spinal muscular atrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mailman MD, Heinz JW, Papp AC, Snyder PJ, Sedra MS, Wirth B et al (2002) Molecular analysis of spinal muscular atrophy and modification of the phenotype by SMN2. Genet Med 4(1):20–26 - DOI
    1. Finkel R, Bertini E, Muntoni F, Mercuri E (2015) 209th ENMC International Workshop: outcome measures and clinical trial readiness in spinal muscular atrophy 7–9 November 2014, Heemskerk The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord 25(7):593–602 - DOI
    1. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J et al (2017) Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 377(18):1723–1732 - DOI
    1. Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM et al (2018) Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 378(7):625–635 - DOI
    1. Baranello G, Darras BT, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Masson R et al (2021) Risdiplam in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 384(10):915–923 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources