Clinical characteristics, treatments, outcome, and prognostic factors of severe autoimmune encephalitis in the intensive care unit: Standard treatment and the value of additional plasma cell-depleting escalation therapies for treatment-refractory patients
- PMID: 36176208
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.15585
Clinical characteristics, treatments, outcome, and prognostic factors of severe autoimmune encephalitis in the intensive care unit: Standard treatment and the value of additional plasma cell-depleting escalation therapies for treatment-refractory patients
Abstract
Background and purpose: To investigate severe autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) with regard to standard treatment in responsive patients and additional escalation therapies for treatment-refractory cases.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed medical records of ICU-dependent AE patients for clinical characteristics, treatments, prognostic factors, and neurological outcome as quantified by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).
Results: From 40 enrolled patients (median age = 52 years; range = 16-89 years) with AE mediated by neuronal surface antibodies (nsAb; 90%) and AE with onconeuronal antibodies (10%), 98% received first-line therapy. Of those, 62% obtained additional second-line therapy, and 33% received escalation therapy with bortezomib and/or daratumumab. Good neurological outcome, defined as mRS = 0-2, was observed in 47% of AE with nsAb (CASE = 5), 77% of anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis patients (CASE = 1), whereas AE patients with onconeuronal antibodies had the poorest outcome (mRS = 6, 100%). Treatment-refractory AE patients with nsAb requiring escalation therapy achieved similarly good recovery (mRS = 0-2, 39%, CASE = 3) as patients improving without (mRS = 0-2, 54%, CASE = 4), although they presented a higher disease severity at disease maximum (mRS = 5 100% versus 68%, CASE = 24 versus 17; p = 0.0036), had longer ICU stays (97 versus 23 days; p = 0.0002), and a higher survival propability during follow-up (p = 0.0203). Prognostic factors for good recovery were younger age (p = 0.025) and lack of preexisting comorbidities (p = 0.011).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that treatment-refractory AE patients with nsAb in the ICU can reach similarly good outcomes after plasma cell-depleting escalation therapy as patients already responding to standard first- and/or second-line therapies.
Keywords: autoimmune encephalitis; bortezomib; daratumumab; intensive care unit; plasma cell depletion.
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.
Comment in
-
Autoimmune encephalitis: Should we consider third-line immunotherapies earlier?Eur J Neurol. 2023 May;30(5):1167-1169. doi: 10.1111/ene.15728. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Eur J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 36794337 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vincent A, Bien CG, Irani SR, Waters P. Autoantibodies associated with diseases of the CNS: new developments and future challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:759-772.
-
- Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, et al. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:835-844.
-
- Machado S, Pinto AN, Irani SR. What should you know about limbic encephalitis? Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70:817-822.
-
- Yeshokumar AK, Gordon-Lipkin E, Arenivas A, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2017;312:8-14.
-
- Mittal MK, Rabinstein AA, Hocker SE, Pittock SJ, Wijdicks EF, McKeon A. Autoimmune encephalitis in the ICU: analysis of phenotypes, serologic findings, and outcomes. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:240-250.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
