Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;10(1):167-176.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14175. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

Cardiovascular and metabolic determinants of quality of life in patients with cancer

Affiliations

Cardiovascular and metabolic determinants of quality of life in patients with cancer

Ruben Evertz et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: Maintaining quality of life (QoL) in patients with cancer has gathered significant interest, but little is known about its major determinants. We sought to identify determinants of QoL in patients undergoing cancer treatment as well as in treatment-naïve patients about to commence such therapy.

Methods and results: QoL was assessed in 283 patients with cancer using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 questionnaire. All patients underwent a battery of tests including physical examination, resting electrocardiogram, hand grip strength, and biochemistry assessment. Using multivariable logistic regression, we found that age [odds ratio (OR) 0.954, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.916-0.994], resting heart rate (OR 1.036, 95% CI 1.004-1.068), hand grip strength (OR 0.932, 95% CI 0.878-0.990), and the presence of cachexia (OR 4.334, 95% CI 1.767-10.631) and dyspnoea (OR 3.725, 95% CI 1.540-9.010; all P < 0.05) remained independently predictive of reduced QoL.

Conclusions: Therefore, it may be reasonable to address circumstances that are affecting muscle mass, body weight, and heart rate to maintaining QoL; however, prospective studies to test these endpoints are required.

Keywords: Cancer; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumour type distribution in the studied population. ENT, ear–nose–throat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative quality of life scores in tumour patients. The two groups are built by using the median summary score. Left: Values are reflecting functional scales. Higher values result in better ‘performance’. Right: Values are reflecting symptom scales. Higher values mean higher symptom burden. All components demonstrated statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

References

    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ‐C30: a quality‐of‐life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 365–376. - PubMed
    1. Sprangers MA, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson NK. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 291–300. - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2018; 19: 3S–73S. - PubMed
    1. Fayers PMANK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomely A. EORTC QLQ‐C30 Scoring Manual. 2001.
    1. Giesinger JM, Kuijpers W, Young T, Tomaszewski KA, Friend E, Zabernigg A, Holzner B, Aaronson NK. Thresholds for clinical importance for four key domains of the EORTC QLQ‐C30: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue and pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14: 87. - PMC - PubMed