DMEK outcome after one year - Results from a large multicenter study in Germany
- PMID: 36178238
- DOI: 10.1111/aos.15257
DMEK outcome after one year - Results from a large multicenter study in Germany
Abstract
Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) accounts for >50% of all corneal transplants in Germany. So far, no data from such a large multicenter study have been published.
Methods: This retrospective study included 3200 DMEKs at seven departments performed for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) or bullous keratopathy (BK). We evaluated best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), endothelial cell density (ECD, cells/mm2 ), minimal corneal thickness (CT, μm), rebubbling-, primary transplant failure- and immune reaction-rate. Changes over time were evaluated by linear mixed models for repeated measures and correlation with case number by center by weighted linear regression.
Results: For patients without vision-limiting comorbidities (74% of all analysed eyes, n = 2270), mean BCVA improved from 0.6 ± 0.4 logMAR to 0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR 6 months (p < 0.001, n = 1441) and 0.1 ± 0.2 logMAR 12 months (p = 0.001, n = 1402) postoperatively. BK- had a worse BCVA compared to FECD-patients (0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 logMAR [p < 0.001] at 1 year). ECD declined from 2465 ± 259 cells/mm2 (n = 2876 preoperatively) to 1587 ± 433 cells/mm2 after 12 months (p < 0.001, n = 1237). Mean rebubbling rate was 0.4 ± 0.7/eye. 784 eyes (25%) received at least one rebubbling. More rebubblings correlated with a lower ECD, a worse BCVA, a higher CT, and higher transplant failure and rejection rates (p < 0.001, p = 0.013 for BCVA at 12 months). A single rebubbling did not influence the BCVA (p = 0.785). Graft failure rate was 3% (n = 67), rejection rate 1.5% (n = 48).
Conclusion: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty increases visual acuity with low transplant failure- and rejection-rates. FECD has a better outcome than BK. Since a quarter of all patients need a rebubbling, this should be included in the informed consent. Remarkably, one rebubbling has no influence on the outcome.
Keywords: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; corneal transplant; rebubbling.
© 2022 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Agha, B., Forster, R., Kohnen, T. & Schmack, I. (2021) Influence of rebubbling on anterior segment parameters and refractive outcomes in eyes with DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 259, 3175-3183.
-
- Chamberlain, W., Lin, C.C., Austin, A., Schubach, N., Clover, J., SD, M.L. et al. (2019) Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial: A randomized trial comparing ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology, 126, 19-26.
-
- Deng, S.X., Lee, W.B., Hammersmith, K.M., Kuo, A.N., Li, J.Y., Shen, J.F. et al. (2018) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Safety and outcomes: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 125, 295-310.
-
- Dirisamer, M., van Dijk, K., Dapena, I., Ham, L., Oganes, O., Frank, L.E. et al. (2012) Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Archives of Ophthalmology, 130, 280-291.
-
- Donner, A., Birkett, N. & Buck, C. (1981) Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 114, 906-914.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
