Moderators and Nonspecific Predictors of Treatment Benefits in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy vs Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain
- PMID: 36180008
- PMCID: PMC9898119
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.09.014
Moderators and Nonspecific Predictors of Treatment Benefits in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy vs Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain
Abstract
Both mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) are effective for chronic low back pain (CLBP), but little is known regarding who might benefit more from one than the other. Using data from a randomized trial comparing MBSR, CBT, and usual care (UC) for adults aged 20 to 70 years with CLBP (N = 297), we examined baseline characteristics that moderated treatment effects or were associated with improvement regardless of treatment. Outcomes included 8-week function (modified Roland Disability Questionnaire), pain bothersomeness (0-10 numerical rating scale), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8). There were differences in the effects of CBT versus MBSR on pain based on participant gender (P = .03) and baseline depressive symptoms (P = .01), but the only statistically significant moderator after Bonferroni correction was the nonjudging dimension of mindfulness. Scores on this measure moderated the effects of CBT versus MBSR on both function (P = .001) and pain (P = .04). Pain control beliefs (P <.001) and lower anxiety (P < .001) predicted improvement regardless of treatment. Replication of these findings is needed to guide treatment decision-making for CLBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial and analysis plan were preregistered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01467843). PERSPECTIVE: Although few potential moderators and nonspecific predictors of benefits from CBT or MBSR for CLBP were statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons, these findings suggest potentially fruitful directions for confirmatory research while providing reassurance that patients could reasonably expect to benefit from either treatment.
Keywords: Chronic back pain; cognitive-behavioral therapy; mindfulness-based stress reduction; predictors; treatment effect modifiers.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest
Judith A. Turner receives royalties from PAR, Inc. on sales of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) and CPCI/Survey of Pain Attitudes (SOPA) score report software. She also has served as a consultant on research and clinical applications related to CBT and CBT-based treatments. Benjamin H. Balderson has served as a consultant on research evaluating CBT and MBSR treatments. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Anheyer D, Haller H, Barth J, Lauche R, Dobos G, Cramer H: Mindfulness-based stress reduction for treating low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 166:799, 2017. - PubMed
-
- Blacker M, Meleo-Meyer F, Kabat-Zinn J, Santorelli S: Stress reduction clinic mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) curriculum guide. Worcester, MA: Center for Mindfulness in Medicine, Health Care and Society, University of Massachusetts Medical School; 2009.
-
- Bohlmeijer E, ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer R: Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment 18:308–20, 2011. - PubMed
-
- Broderick JE, Keefe FJ, Schneider S, Junghaenel DU, Bruckenthal P, Schwartz JE, Kaell AT, Caldwell DS, McKee D, Gould E: Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain is effective, but for whom?: PAIN 157:2115–23, 2016. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
