Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):396.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01977-7.

How is pain associated with pelvic mesh implants measured? Refinement of the construct and a scoping review of current assessment tools

Jennifer Todd  1   2 , Jane E Aspell  3 , Michael C Lee  4   5 , Nikesh Thiruchelvam  6
Affiliations

How is pain associated with pelvic mesh implants measured? Refinement of the construct and a scoping review of current assessment tools

Jennifer Todd et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Recommendations for the management of pain related to pelvic mesh implants are still under development. One limitation that has impeded progress in this area is that mesh-related pain has not been consistently defined or measured. Here, we reviewed the ways in which pain associated with pelvic mesh implants has been measured, and mapped the ways in which these existing measures capture the construct.

Methods: First, we reviewed existing accounts of the pain associated with pelvic mesh implants to develop a multifaceted construct definition, which includes aspects related to pain intensity, timing, body location, phenomenological qualities, impact/interference with daily living, and patient expectations and beliefs. Next, we reviewed the ways that the construct has been measured in the extant literature.

Results: Within 333 eligible studies, 28 different assessments of pain associated with pelvic mesh were identified, and 61% of studies reported using more than one measurement tool. Questionnaire measures included measures designed to assess urological and/or pelvic symptoms, generic measures and unvalidated measures. We did not identify any validated questionnaire measures designed to assess pain associated with pelvic mesh implants. The phenomenological, location, and expectation/belief components of the construct were not captured well by the identified questionnaire measures, and there is no evidence that any of the identified measures have appropriate psychometric properties for the assessment of pain related to pelvic mesh implants.

Conclusions: We recommend further qualitative research regarding women's experiences of pelvic mesh-related pain assessment, and the development of a condition-specific patient reported outcome measure.

Keywords: Assessment; Pain; Pelvic mesh; Pelvic organ prolapse; Psychometric; Stress urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have not competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search strategy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caveney M, Haddad D, Matthews C, Badlani G, Mirzazadeh M. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(8):2044–2048. - PubMed
    1. Funk MJ, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Pate V, Wu JM. Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1279–1285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT) Lancet. 2017;389(10067):381–392. - PubMed
    1. Cumberlege J. First do no harm: The report of the IMMDS Review. 2020. Available from: https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/Report.html
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:1645–1858. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types