Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):129.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01490-0.

Using natural language processing to automatically classify written self-reported narratives by patients with migraine or cluster headache

Nicolas Vandenbussche  1   2 , Cynthia Van Hee  3 , Véronique Hoste  3 , Koen Paemeleire  4   5
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Using natural language processing to automatically classify written self-reported narratives by patients with migraine or cluster headache

Nicolas Vandenbussche et al. J Headache Pain. .

Abstract

Background: Headache medicine is largely based on detailed history taking by physicians analysing patients' descriptions of headache. Natural language processing (NLP) structures and processes linguistic data into quantifiable units. In this study, we apply these digital techniques on self-reported narratives by patients with headache disorders to research the potential of analysing and automatically classifying human-generated text and information extraction in clinical contexts.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional clinical trial collected self-reported narratives on headache disorders from participants with either migraine or cluster headache. NLP was applied for the analysis of lexical, semantic and thematic properties of the texts. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to classify the descriptions of headache attacks from individual participants into their correct group (migraine versus cluster headache).

Results: One-hundred and twenty-one patients (81 participants with migraine and 40 participants with cluster headache) provided a self-reported narrative on their headache disorder. Lexical analysis of this text corpus resulted in several specific key words per diagnostic group (cluster headache: Dutch (nl): "oog" | English (en): "eye", nl: "pijn" | en: "pain" and nl: "terug" | en: "back/to come back"; migraine: nl: "hoofdpijn" | en: "headache", nl: "stress" | en: "stress" and nl: "misselijkheid" | en: "nausea"). Thematic and sentiment analysis of text revealed largely negative sentiment in texts by both patients with migraine and cluster headache. Logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms with different feature groups performed best for the classification of attack descriptions (with F1-scores for detecting cluster headache varying between 0.82 and 0.86) compared to naïve Bayes classifiers.

Conclusions: Differences in lexical choices between patients with migraine and cluster headache are detected with NLP and are congruent with domain expert knowledge of the disorders. Our research shows that ML algorithms have potential to classify patients' self-reported narratives of migraine or cluster headache with good performance. NLP shows its capability to discern relevant linguistic aspects in narratives from patients with different headache disorders and demonstrates relevance in clinical information extraction. The potential benefits on the classification performance of larger datasets and neural NLP methods can be investigated in the future.

Trial registration: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov with ID NCT05377437.

Keywords: Cluster headache; Machine learning; Migraine; Natural language processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Key words per diagnosis (red colour migraine, blue colour cluster headache). Legend: (*) = p < 1*10–2, (**) = p < 1*10–5, (***) = p < 1*10–8. Abbreviations: chi2abs = absolute value of the chi-squared statistic, en = English, nl = Dutch
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vos T, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBDH Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(11):954–976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache 38(1):1–211. 10.1177/0333102417738202 - PubMed
    1. Steiner TJ. Headache * commentary: headache in South America. BMJ. 2002;325(7369):881–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.881. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S. Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(2):553–622. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data