Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;25(6):2700-2708.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13620. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care

Affiliations
Review

Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care

Huayi Huang et al. Health Expect. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity (the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions within an individual) is a complex management challenge, with a very limited evidence base. Theories can help in the design and operationalization of complex interventions.

Objective: This article proposes self-determination theory (SDT) as a candidate theory for the development and evaluation of interventions in multimorbidity.

Methods: We provide an overview of SDT, its use in research to date, and its potential utility in complex interventions for patients with multimorbidity based on the new MRC framework.

Results: SDT-based interventions have mainly focused on health behaviour change in the primary prevention of disease, with limited use in primary care and chronic conditions management. However, SDT may be a useful candidate theory in informing complex intervention development and evaluation, both in randomized controlled trials and in evaluations of 'natural experiments'. We illustrate how it could be used multimorbidity interventions in primary care by drawing on the example of CARE Plus (a primary care-based complex intervention for patients with multimorbidity in deprived areas of Scotland).

Conclusions: SDT may have utility in both the design and evaluation of complex interventions for multimorbidity. Further research is required to establish its usefulness, and limitations, compared with other candidate theories.

Patient or public contribution: Our funded research programme, of which this paper is an early output, has a newly embedded patient and public involvement group of four members with lived experience of long-term conditions and/or of being informal carers. They read and commented on the draft manuscript and made useful suggestions on the text. They will be fully involved at all stages in the rest of the programme of research.

Keywords: motivation; personal autonomy; primary care; professional autonomy; self-determination theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The three basic ingredients of mental well‐being according to SDT. SDT, self‐determination theory.
Figure 2
Figure 2
How external motives for action, become increasingly internalized into the ‘autonomous self’
Figure 3
Figure 3
Using SDT in the design, delivery and evaluation of a definitive Phase 3 CARE Plus RCT. SDT, self‐determination theory.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE) . Multimorbidity: clinical assessment and management NICE guideline [NG56]. National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness. 2016.
    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37‐43. - PubMed
    1. Moffat K, Mercer SW. Challenges of managing people with multimorbidity in today's healthcare systems. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sciences AoM . Multiple Long‐Term Conditions (Multimorbidity): A Priority for Global Health Research. Sciences AoM; 2018.
    1. Zhao Y, Atun R, Oldenburg B, et al. Physical multimorbidity, health service use, and catastrophic health expenditure by socioeconomic groups in China: an analysis of population‐based panel data. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(6):e840‐e849. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types