Transformation of animal agriculture should be evidence-driven and respectful of livestock's benefits and contextual aspects

Affiliations

¹ Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Frederic.Leroy@vub.be.
² UMR CNRS 6240 LISA, Università di Corsica Pasquale Paoli, France.
³ Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Washington, DC, USA; Institute for Social, Behavioral and Economic Research, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
⁴ Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK; International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
⁵ Pastoral Livestock Production Lab, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand; Centre of Excellence for Designing Future Productive Landscapes, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand.
⁶ Global Change and Conservation Lab, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Basque Centre For Climate Change (BC3), Edificio Sede, Campus EHU, Leioa, Spain; Ikerbasque - Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
⁷ Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
⁸ Center for Human Nutrition Studies, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

Free article

Comment

Frédéric Leroy et al. Animal. 2022 Oct.

Free article

. 2022 Oct;16(10):100644.

doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100644. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

¹ Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Frederic.Leroy@vub.be.
² UMR CNRS 6240 LISA, Università di Corsica Pasquale Paoli, France.
³ Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Washington, DC, USA; Institute for Social, Behavioral and Economic Research, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
⁴ Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK; International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
⁵ Pastoral Livestock Production Lab, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand; Centre of Excellence for Designing Future Productive Landscapes, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand.
⁶ Global Change and Conservation Lab, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Basque Centre For Climate Change (BC3), Edificio Sede, Campus EHU, Leioa, Spain; Ikerbasque - Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
⁷ Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
⁸ Center for Human Nutrition Studies, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

No abstract available

Comment on

Animal board invited review: Animal source foods in healthy, sustainable, and ethical diets - An argument against drastic limitation of livestock in the food system.
Leroy F, Abraini F, Beal T, Dominguez-Salas P, Gregorini P, Manzano P, Rowntree J, van Vliet S. Leroy F, et al. Animal. 2022 Mar;16(3):100457. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100457. Epub 2022 Feb 11. Animal. 2022. PMID: 35158307 Review.