Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;69(6):3530-3539.
doi: 10.1111/tbed.14716. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs

Gabriele Ratti  1 , Davide Lelli  2 , Ana Moreno  2 , Angelica Stranieri  1 , Tiziana Trogu  2 , Alessia Giordano  1 , Andrea Grassi  3 , Camilla Luzzago  1 , Nicola Decaro  4 , Saverio Paltrinieri  1 , Stefania Lauzi  1
Affiliations

Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs

Gabriele Ratti et al. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Serosurveillance among animals, including pets, plays an important role in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, because severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in animal populations could result in the establishment of new virus reservoirs. Serological assays that offer the required sensitivity and specificity are essential. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of three different commercially available immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets, namely two ELISA tests for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid [ID Screen SARS CoV-2 double antigen multispecies (Double antigen) and ID Screen® SARS-CoV-2-N IgG indirect ELISA (Indirect)] and one test for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding-domain [surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT)]. The obtained results were compared with those of conventional virus neutralization test (VNT), which was regarded as reference method. A total of 191 serum samples were analysed. Thirteen (6.8%) samples showed VNT-positive results. The overall sensitivity was higher for sVNT (100%) compared to nucleocapsid-based ELISA assays (23% for Double antigen and 60% for Indirect). The specificity was 100% for Indirect ELISA and sVNT, when a higher cut-off (>30%) was used compared to the one previously defined by the manufacturer (>20%), whereas the other test showed lower value (99%). The sVNT test showed the highest accuracy and agreement with VNT, with a perfect agreement when the higher cut-off was applied. The agreement between each nucleocapsid-based ELISA test and VNT was 96% for Indirect and 94% for Double antigen. Our findings showed that some commercially available serological tests may lead to a high rate of false-negative results, highlighting the importance of assays validation for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in domestic animals.

Keywords: cats; diagnostic tests accuracy; dogs; immunological assay; serosurveillance; severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Addie, D., Belák, S., Boucraut-Baralon, C., Egberink, H., Frymus, T., Gruffydd-Jones, T., Hartmann, K., Hosie, M. J., Lloret, A., Lutz, H., Marsilio, F., Pennisi, M. G., Radford, A. D., Thiry, E., Truyen, U., & Horzinek, M. C. (2009). Feline infectious peritonitis. ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 11(7), 594-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2009.05.008
    1. Adler, J. M., Weber, C., Wernike, K., Michelitsch, A., Friedrich, K., Trimpert, J., Beer, M., Kohn, B., Osterrieder, K., & Müller, E. (2022). Prevalence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies in cats in Germany and other European countries in the early phase of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic. Zoonoses and Public Health, . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12932
    1. Balboni, A., Gallina, L., Palladini, A., Prosperi, S., & Battilani, M. (2012). A real-time PCR assay for bat SARS-like coronavirus detection and its application to Italian greater horseshoe bat faecal sample surveys. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 989514.
    1. Barua, S., Hoque, M., Adekanmbi, F., Kelly, P., Jenkins-Moore, M., Torchetti, M. K., Chenoweth, K., Wood, T., & Wang, C. (2021). Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats, USA. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 10(1), 1669-1674. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1967101
    1. Bosco-Lauth, A. M., Hartwig, A. E., Porter, S. M., Gordy, P. W., Nehring, M., Byas, A. D., VandeWoude, S., Ragan, I. K., Maison, R. M., & Bowen, R. A. (2020). Experimental infection of domestic dogs and cats with SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenesis, transmission, and response to reexposure in cats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(42), 26382-26388. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013102117