Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;50(2):879-893.
doi: 10.1002/mp.16017. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Streaking artifact reduction for CBCT-based synthetic CT generation in adaptive radiotherapy

Affiliations

Streaking artifact reduction for CBCT-based synthetic CT generation in adaptive radiotherapy

Liugang Gao et al. Med Phys. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for daily image guidance in radiation therapy, enhancing the reproducibility of patient setup. However, its application in adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is limited by many imaging artifacts and inaccurate Hounsfield units (HUs). The correction of CBCT image is necessary and of great value for CBCT-based ART.

Purpose: To explore the synthetic CT (sCT) generation from CBCT images of thorax and abdomen patients, which usually surfer from serious artifacts duo to organ state changes. In this study, a streaking artifact reduction network (SARN) is proposed to reduce artifacts and combine with cycleGAN to generate high-quality sCT images from CBCT and achieve an accurate dose calculation.

Methods: The proposed SARN was trained in a self-supervised manner. Artifact-CT images were generated from planning CT by random deformation and projection replacement, and SARN was trained based on paired artifact-CT and CT images. The planning CT and CBCT images of 260 patients with cancer, including 120 thoracic and 140 abdominal CT scans, were used to train and evaluate neural networks. The CBCT images of another 12 patients in late treatment fractions, which contained large anatomy changes, were also tested by trained models. The trained models include commonly used U-Net, cycleGAN, attention-gated cycleGAN (cycAT), and cascade models combined SARN with cycleGAN or cycAT. The generated sCT images were compared in terms of image quality and dose calculation accuracy.

Results: The sCT images generated by SARN combined with cycleGAN and cycAT showed the best image quality, removed the most artifacts, and retained the normal anatomical structure. The SARN+cycleGAN performed best in streaking artifacts removal with the maximum percent integrity uniformity (PIUm ) of 91.0% and minimum standard deviation (SD) of 35.4 HU for delineated artifact regions among all models. The mean absolute error (MAE) of CBCT images in the thorax and abdomen were 71.6 and 55.2 HU, respectively, using planning CT images after deformable registration as ground truth. Compared with CBCT, the thoracic and abdominal sCT images generated by each model had significantly improved image quality with smaller MAE (p < 0.05). The SARN+cycAT obtained the minimum MAEs of 42.5 HU in the thorax while SARN+cycleGAN got the minimum MAEs of 32.0 HU in the abdomen. The sCT generated by U-Net had a remarkably lower anatomical structure accuracy compared with the other models. The thoracic and abdominal sCT images generated by SARN+cycleGAN showed optimal dose calculation accuracy with gamma passing rates (2 mm/2%) of 98.2% and 96.9%, respectively.

Conclusions: The proposed SARN can reduce serious streaking artifacts in CBCT images. The SARN combined with cycleGAN can generate high-quality sCT images with fewer artifacts, high-accuracy HU values, and accurate anatomical structures, thus providing reliable dose calculation in ART.

Keywords: CBCT; adaptive radiotherapy; image quality; streaking artifacts; synthetic CT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Barker JL Jr, Garden AS, Ang KK, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(4):960-970.
    1. Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(1):123-132.
    1. Sonke JJ, Aznar M, Rasch C. Adaptive radiotherapy for anatomical changes. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):245-257.
    1. Cho PS, Johnson RH, Griffin TW. Cone-beam CT for radiotherapy applications. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40:1863-1883.
    1. Lai CJ, Chen L, Zhang H, et al. Reduction in x-ray scatter and radiation dose for volume-of-interest (VOI) cone-beam breast CT-a phantom study. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(21):6691-6709.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources