Orienting versus inhibition: The theory behind the ocular-based Concealed Information Test
- PMID: 36183237
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14186
Orienting versus inhibition: The theory behind the ocular-based Concealed Information Test
Abstract
When trying to conceal one's knowledge, various ocular changes occur. However, which cognitive mechanisms drive these changes? Do orienting or inhibition-two processes previously associated with autonomic changes-play a role? To answer this question, we used a Concealed Information Test (CIT) in which participants were either motivated to conceal (orienting + inhibition) or reveal (orienting only) their knowledge. While pupil size increased in both motivational conditions, the fixation and blink CIT effects were confined to the conceal condition. These results were mirrored in autonomic changes, with skin conductance increasing in both conditions while heart rate decreased solely under motivation to conceal. Thus, different cognitive mechanisms seem to drive ocular responses. Pupil size appears to be linked to the orienting of attention (akin to skin conductance changes), while fixations and blinks rather seem to reflect arousal inhibition (comparable to heart rate changes). This knowledge strengthens CIT theory and illuminates the relationship between ocular and autonomic activity.
Keywords: Concealed Information Test (CIT); arousal inhibition; autonomic; oculomotor; orienting response; response fractionation.
© 2022 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.
References
-
- Bagley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(2), 591-594. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.591
-
- Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). Effects of questions' repetition and variation on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test: A reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 972-977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.972
-
- Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
-
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
- Cook, A. E., Hacker, D. J., Webb, A. K., Osher, D., Kristjansson, S. D., Woltz, D. J., & Kircher, J. C. (2012). Lyin’ eyes: Ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028307
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
