Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15;63(5):900-909.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac152.

Constructing Discrimination Rights: Comparisons Among Staff in Long-Term Care Health Facilities

Angela K Perone  1
Affiliations

Constructing Discrimination Rights: Comparisons Among Staff in Long-Term Care Health Facilities

Angela K Perone. Gerontologist. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite increased attention to racial and gender justice in the workplace in recent years, discrimination complaints remain vastly underreported. Building on legal consciousness theory-which explains how individuals invoke (or do not invoke) legal principles to define everyday experiences-this study examines how long-term care facility staff understand experiences of discrimination by residents and why staff fails to report discrimination.

Research design and methods: This qualitative comparative study uses in-depth semistructured ethnographic interviews to compare experiences among facility staff (n = 80) at three levels (floor staff, mid-management, and upper-management). The qualitative content analysis incorporated both inductive and deductive coding approaches.

Results: Findings reveal extensive unreported instances of discrimination from residents. Staff at all levels rarely invoked discrimination concepts to describe interactions between residents and staff. Floor staff framed residents' discriminatory behavior as a condition of employment or attributed resident behavior to their health or cognitive status. Mid-management framed experiences around staff safety. Upper-management acknowledged staff rights without invoking discrimination rhetoric.

Discussion and implications: By avoiding naming experiences as discrimination and blaming residents, most floor staff never reached the claiming process that would result in a report or complaint of discrimination. Managers' framings also shaped how front-line staff and managers named, blamed, and claimed experiences of discrimination and help explain why staff may be hesitant to report discrimination by residents. These findings suggest the need for new and targeted policy and practice approaches that address the nuances accompanying how staff understands workplace experiences as discrimination.

Keywords: Direct care workers; Gender; Nursing homes; Qualitative; Race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen, E. M. (2020). Workplace discrimination and health: A longitudinal analysis of gender differences and intergenerational outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University). ProQuest.
    1. Ball, M. M., Lepore, M. L., Perkins, M. M., Hollingsworth, C., & Sweatman, M. (2009). “They are the reason I come to work”: The meaning of resident—staff relationships in assisted living. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(1), 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2007.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates, T., Amah, G., & Coffman, J. (2018). Racial/ethnic diversity in long-term care workforce. Health Workforce Research Center on Long-Term Care Research Report. Available at https://healthworkforce.ucsf.edu/sites/healthworkforce.ucsf.edu/files/RE...
    1. Bjerregaard, K., Haslam, S. A., Mewse, A., & Morton, T. (2017). The shared experience of caring: A study of care-workers’ motivations and identifications at work. Ageing and Society, 37, 113–138. doi:10.1017/S0144686X15000860 - DOI
    1. Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 7, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq (1964).