Clinical outcomes of cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review
- PMID: 36183281
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03400-1
Clinical outcomes of cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment method for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. Both cemented and uncemented techniques exist, with uncemented reverse total shoulder offering many theoretical advantages, including improved biologic fixation, absence of cement related complications, and ease of revision if necessary. There are few studies comparing the outcomes of the two techniques.
Methods: The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search for studies assessing clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures was performed of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Main outcomes included Constant Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and complication rate. Inclusion criteria were as follows: indication for arthroplasty was fracture; minimum one year follow up; article in English. Exclusion criteria were as follows: review articles; biomechanical or cadaver studies. Quality analysis was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.
Results: A total of 682 studies were identified through the initial search, with 36 studies meeting all inclusion criteria. There were 24 studies investigating cemented technique, 10 studies examining uncemented technique, and two studies involving both techniques. There was no difference in mean follow up between patients receiving a cemented vs. uncemented rTSA (32.3 months vs. 30.6 months, p = 0.06). Patients who received a cemented rTSA had a significantly higher Constant-Murley score than those who received an uncemented rTSA (59.4 vs 55.9, p < .001). There was no difference between the two groups when comparing ASES Scores (77.5 vs 78.6, p = 0.54) and overall complication rates (11.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.23).
Conclusion: Both cemented and uncemented rTSA are both valid options for treating acute proximal humerus fractures. Cemented rTSA may portend slightly improved clinical outcomes with similar overall complication rates compared to uncemented rTSA for proximal humerus fractures.
Keywords: Cemented; Proximal humerus fracture; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Uncemented.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- McLean AS, Price N, Graves S, Hatton A, Taylor FJ (2019) Nationwide trends in management of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of 77,966 cases from 2008 to 2017. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:2072–2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.034 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dillon MT, Prentice HA, Burfeind WE, Chan PH, Navarro RA (2019) The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 50:676–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.034 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cuff D, Pupello D (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2050–2055. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01637 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chalmers PN, Slikker W 3rd, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Enriquez D et al (2014) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
