Systemic hormone therapy and dementia: A nested case-control and co-twin control study
- PMID: 36184115
- PMCID: PMC12044222
- DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.04.007
Systemic hormone therapy and dementia: A nested case-control and co-twin control study
Abstract
Objective: The effect of systemic hormone therapy (HT) on dementia risk is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between HT and dementia.
Study design: This register-based study consists of a nested case-control study and a co-twin control design, which controls for familial confounding, including shared genetics.
Main outcome measures: Through Danish national registries from 1995 to 2011, we identified: a) 2700 female singletons with incident dementia and 13,492 matched controls; b) 288 female twins with incident dementia and co-twins without dementia. Data on HT and education were retrieved, and analyses were performed using conditional logistic regression and McNemar's χ2-test. HT use decreased dramatically after the Women's Health Initiative study results were published in 2002, and the analyses were stratified accordingly to account for potentially different HT user characteristics.
Results: The odds ratio (OR) for the association between systemic HT and dementia was 1.05, 95% CI = [0.93-1.19] in singletons and 2.10, 95% CI = [0.99-4.46] in twins. A statistically significant association was found for systemic HT before 2003 in both populations, with an OR of 1.14, 95% CI = [1.01-1.28] in singletons and an OR of 2.20, 95% CI = [1.04-4.65] in twins.
Conclusion: Using Danish nationwide registries and controlling for education and for familial factors in a subsample, systemic HT was found to be associated with increased dementia risk if used before 2003, when HT was more commonly prescribed.
Keywords: Population-based study; Postmenopausal hormone therapy; Register data; Twins.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Estrogen and dementia.Maturitas. 2022 Nov;165:120-121. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 25. Maturitas. 2022. PMID: 36184116 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Larson EB, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N, Dementia prevention, intervention, and care, Lancet (London, England) 390 (10113) (2017) 2673–2734. - PubMed
-
- Wu YT, Fratiglioni L, Matthews FE, Lobo A, Breteler MM, Skoog I, Brayne C, Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making, Lancet Neurol. 15 (1) (2016) 116–124. - PubMed
-
- Taudorf L, Norgaard A, Islamoska S, Jorgensen K, Laursen TM, Waldemar G, Declining incidence of dementia: a national registry-based study over 20 years, Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 15 (11) (2019) 1383–1391. - PubMed
-
- Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families, Science 261 (5123) (1993) 921–923. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
