Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 8;15(9):100682.
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100682. eCollection 2022 Sep.

World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XIII - Oral immunotherapy for CMA - Systematic review

Collaborators, Affiliations

World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XIII - Oral immunotherapy for CMA - Systematic review

Antonio Bognanni et al. World Allergy Organ J. .

Abstract

Background: Allergy to cow's milk is the most common food allergy in infants and it is usually outgrown by 5 years of age. In some individuals it persists beyond early childhood. Oral immunotherapy (OIT, oral desensitization, specific oral tolerance induction) has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy for persistent IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. We previously published the systematic review of OIT for cow's milk allergy (CMA) in 2010 as part of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines.

Objective: To systematically synthesize the currently available evidence about OIT for IgE-mediated CMA and to inform the updated 2022 WAO guidelines.

Methods: We searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the websites of selected allergy organizations. We included all studies irrespective of the language of the original publication. The last search was conducted in February 2021. We registered the protocol on Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/AH2DT).

Results: We identified 2147 unique records published between 2010 and 2021, including 13 randomized trials and 109 observational studies addressing cow's milk OIT. We found low-certainty evidence that OIT with unheated cow's milk, compared to elimination diet alone, increased the likelihood of being able to consume ≥150 ml of cow's milk in controlled settings (risk ratio (RR): 12.3, 95% CI: 5.9 to 26.0; risk difference (RD): 25 more per 100, 95% CI 11 to 56) as well as accidently ingest a small amount (≥5 ml) of cow's milk (RR: 8.7, 95% CI: 4.7 to 16.1; RD: 25 more per 100, 95% CI 12 to 50). However, 2-8 weeks after discontinuation of a successful OIT, tolerance of cow's milk persisted in only 36% (range: 20%-91%) of patients. OIT increased the frequency of anaphylaxis (rate ratio: 60.0, 95% CI 15 to 244; rate difference 5 more anaphylactic reactions per 1 person per year, 95% CI: 4 to 6; moderate evidence) and the frequency of epinephrine use (rate ratio: 35.2, 95% CI: 9 to 136.5; rate difference 268 more events per 100 person-years, 95% CI: 203 to 333; high certainty). OIT also increased the risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (RR 6.9, 95% CI 1.6-30.9; RD 28 more per 100, CI 3 to 100) and respiratory symptoms (RR 49.0, 95% CI 3.12-770.6; RD 77 more per 100, CI 62 to 92), compared with avoidance diet alone. Single-arm observational studies showed that on average 6.9% of OIT patients (95% CI: 3.8%-10%) developed eosinophilic esophagitis (very low certainty evidence). We found 1 trial and 2 small case series of OIT with baked milk.

Conclusions: Moderate certainty evidence shows that OIT with unheated cow's milk in patients with IgE-mediated CMA is associated with an increased probability of being able to drink milk and, at the same time, an increased risk of serious adverse effects.

Keywords: GRADE; Meta-analysis; Milk allergy; Oral immunotherapy; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram for the flow of records/studies through the study selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Logarithm of the risk ratio of consuming at least 150 ml of milk in the RCTs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Logarithm of risk ratio for consuming at least 5 ml of milk in the RCTs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Logarithm of the rate ratio of IM epinephrine injections per patient-month in the RCTs
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Logarithm of the risk ratio of AE leading to discontinuation of treatment in the RCTs
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Logarithm of the risk ratio of gastrointestinal AE in the RCTs
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Logarithm of the risk ratio of generalized erythema or urticaria in the RCTs
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Logarithm of risk ratio of manifesting perioral pruritus in the RCTs
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Weighted mean proportion of patients developing EoE after OIT in the NRS

References

    1. Rona R.J., Keil T., Summers C., et al. The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3):638–646. - PubMed
    1. Nwaru B.I., Hickstein L., Panesar S.S., et al. The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2014;69(1):62–75. - PubMed
    1. Schoemaker A.A., Sprikkelman A.B., Grimshaw K.E., et al. Incidence and natural history of challenge-proven cow's milk allergy in European children–EuroPrevall birth cohort. Allergy. 2015;70(8):963–972. - PubMed
    1. Spergel J.M. Natural history of cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(3):813–814. - PubMed
    1. Hill D.J., Firer M.A., Ball G., Hosking C.S. Natural history of cows' milk allergy in children: immunological outcome over 2 years. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23(2):124–131. - PubMed