Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 16:13:1002448.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1002448. eCollection 2022.

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production: The past, present, and future

Affiliations
Review

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production: The past, present, and future

Becky N Aloo et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed increased agricultural production to match the global demand for food fueled by population increase. Conventional agricultural practices are heavily reliant on artificial fertilizers that have numerous human and environmental health effects. Cognizant of this, sustainability researchers and environmentalists have increased their focus on other crop fertilization mechanisms. Biofertilizers are microbial formulations constituted of indigenous plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that directly or indirectly promote plant growth through the solubilization of soil nutrients, and the production of plant growth-stimulating hormones and iron-sequestering metabolites called siderophores. Biofertilizers have continually been studied, recommended, and even successfully adopted for the production of many crops in the world. These microbial products hold massive potential as sustainable crop production tools, especially in the wake of climate change that is partly fueled by artificial fertilizers. Despite the growing interest in the technology, its full potential has not yet been achieved and utilization still seems to be in infancy. There is a need to shed light on the past, current, and future prospects of biofertilizers to increase their understanding and utility. This review evaluates the history of PGPR biofertilizers, assesses their present utilization, and critically advocates their future in sustainable crop production. It, therefore, updates our understanding of the evolution of PGPR biofertilizers in crop production. Such information can facilitate the evaluation of their potential and ultimately pave the way for increased exploitation.

Keywords: biofertilizers; microbial formulations; microbial stimulants; plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; sustainable agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Terminologies used interchangeably with microbial biofertilizers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A simulation of the various functions of biofertilizers in plant growth promotion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phosphorus solubilization mechanisms depending on the types of available soil P.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Plant growth promotion through the production of different phytohormones and (B) PGPR-mediated plant growth promotion is governed through a complex network of cell signaling, genetic regulation, hormonal cross-talk, and enzymatic transformation. The PGPR generates multiple stimuli through the synthesis of phytohormones. These phytohormones interact through phosphorylation cascade or activating a secondary messenger which leads to the regulation of genes affecting hormone biosynthesis and developmental process in plants (Khan et al., 2020).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic representation of the past present and future of biofertilizer development.

References

    1. Abdelmoteleb A., Gonzalez-Mendoza D. (2020). Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizing bacillus spp. from Tamarix ramosissima rhizosphere and their effect on growth of Phaseolus vulgaris under salinity stress. Geomicrobiol J. 37, 901–908. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2020.1795321 - DOI
    1. Abhilash P., Dubey R. K., Tripathi V., Gupta V. K., Singh H. B. (2016a). Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for environmental sustainability. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 847–850. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abhilash P., Tripathi V., Edrisi S. A., Dubey R. K., Bakshi M., Dubey P. K., et al. (2016b). Sustainability of crop production from polluted lands. Energy Ecol. Environ. 1, 54–65. doi: 10.1007/s40974-016-0007-x - DOI
    1. Adeleke R. A., Raimi A. R., Roopnarain A., Mokubedi S. M. (2019). “Status and prospects of bacterial inoculants for sustainable Management of Agroecosystems” in Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. eds. Giri B., Prasad R., Wu Q. S., Varma A. (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 137–172.
    1. Agisha V. N., Kumar A., Eapen S. J., Sheoran N., Suseelabhai R. (2019). Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of volatile organic compounds from endophytic pseudomonas putida BP25 against diverse plant pathogens. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 29, 1069–1089. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2019.1657067 - DOI