Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;15(12):2239-2254.
doi: 10.1007/s11869-022-01248-2. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

Human risk assessment of ash soil after 2020 wildfires in Pantanal biome (Brazil)

Sofia Caumo  1   2 , Wilkinson L Lázaro  3 , Ernandes Sobreira Oliveira Jr  3 , Karmel Beringui  4 , Adriana Gioda  4 , Carlos German Massone  4 , Renato Carreira  4 , Djair Sergio de Freitas Jr  3 , Aurea R A Ignacio  3 , Sandra Hacon  1   2   3
Affiliations

Human risk assessment of ash soil after 2020 wildfires in Pantanal biome (Brazil)

Sofia Caumo et al. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2022.

Abstract

Wildfires have increased in the last years and, when caused by intentional illegal burnings, are frequently run out of control. Wildfire has been pointed out as an important source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and trace elements (TEs) - such as, As, Ni, and Pb - to environmental compartments, and thus may pose a risk to human health and to the ecosystem. In 2020, the Brazilian biome, Pantanal, faced the largest losses by wildfires in the last 22 years. Ashes from the topsoil layer in Pantanal were collected after these wildfires at 20 sites divided into the sediment, forest, PF, PS, and degraded sites. Toxicity and associated risks for human health were also evaluated. The areas highly impacted by wildfires and by artisanal gold mining activities showed higher concentrations for TEs and PAHs than the protected areas. Pb varied from 8 ± 4 to 224 ± 81 mg kg-1, and total PAH concentration ranged between 880 ± 314 and 1350 ± 70 ng g-1, at sites impacted by anthropogenic activities. Moreover, health risk assessments for TE and PAH indicated a potentially great risk for children and adults, via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal pathway. The carcinogenic risks exceeded reference values, for both TE and PAH, suggesting harmful conditions, especially for vulnerable groups, such as children and the elderly.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11869-022-01248-2.

Keywords: Pantanal; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Risk assessment; Trace elements; Wildfire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of sampling sites in Pantanal
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplot and bar plots of element concentration to sediment and forest sites, protected sediment and forest areas, and degraded sites comparing ash contents to the criteria obtained from the literature. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), plant–avian–mammalian screening level (red line), and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), and soil quality guideline for agricultural and residential land use (blue line)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplot and bar plots of element concentration to sediment and forest sites, protected sediment and forest areas, and degraded sites comparing ash contents to the criteria obtained from the literature. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), plant–avian–mammalian screening level (red line), and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), and soil quality guideline for agricultural and residential land use (blue line)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PCA variables for trace elements (a) and cluster plot for sampling sites (b) related to ash samples collected at Pantanal
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Total of PAHs at sampling points in the present study and previous studies around the world. From ∑15PAH (Portugal) to ∑24PAH (Brazilian Amazon)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
PAH contribution in ash samples at Pantanal sites
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for ingestion, dermal and total exposure, and carcinogenic B[a]P equivalent (BaPEQ) concentration at all sites in Pantanal ash samples
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSMM (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 25:107–123. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011
    1. Abdul KSM, Jayasinghe SS, Chandana EPS, Jayasumana C, De Silva PMCS. Arsenic and human health effects: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;40:828–846. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguilera R, Corringham T, Gershunov A, Benmarhnia T. Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1493. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21708-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alam MdJ, Yuan D, Jiang YJ, Sun Y, Li Y, Xu X (2014) Sources and transports of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Nanshan underground river, China. Environ Earth Sci 71: 1967–1976. 10.1007/s12665-013-2847-4
    1. Alcasena F, Ager A, Le Page Y, Bessa P, Loureiro C, Oliveira T. Assessing wildfire exposure to communities and protected areas in Portugal. Fire. 2021;4:82. doi: 10.3390/fire4040082. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources