Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 15:10:949594.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949594. eCollection 2022.

Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022

Affiliations

Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022

Yan Niu et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may undergo changes due to the mutation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in the outbreaks of the different strains with regards to aspects such as epidemiological characteristics, transmissibility, and difficulties in prevention and control.

Methods: COVID-19 data from outbreaks of pre-Delta strains, the Delta variant and Omicron variant, were obtained from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Case data were collected from China's direct-reporting system, and the data concerning outbreaks were collected by on-site epidemiological investigators and collated by the authors of this paper. Indicators such as the effective reproduction number (R eff), time-dependent reproduction number (R t), rate of decrease in transmissibility (RDT), and duration from the illness onset date to the diagnosed date (D ID )/reported date (D IR ) were used to compare differences in transmissibility between pre-Delta strains, Delta variants and Omicron variants. Non-parametric tests (namely the Kruskal-Wallis H and Mean-Whitney U tests) were used to compare differences in epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility between outbreaks of different strains. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results: Mainland China has maintained a "dynamic zero-out strategy" since the first case was reported, and clusters of outbreaks have occurred intermittently. The strains causing outbreaks in mainland China have gone through three stages: the outbreak of pre-Delta strains, the outbreak of the Delta variant, and outbreaks involving the superposition of Delta and Omicron variant strains. Each outbreak of pre-Delta strains went through two stages: a rising stage and a falling stage, Each outbreak of the Delta variant and Omicron variant went through three stages: a rising stage, a platform stage and a falling stage. The maximum R eff value of Omicron variant outbreaks was highest (median: 6.7; ranged from 5.3 to 8.0) and the differences were statistically significant. The RDT value of outbreaks involving pre-Delta strains was smallest (median: 91.4%; [IQR]: 87.30-94.27%), and the differences were statistically significant. The D ID and D IR for all strains was mostly in a range of 0-2 days, with more than 75%. The range of duration for outbreaks of pre-Delta strains was the largest (median: 20 days, ranging from 1 to 61 days), and the differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion: With the evolution of the virus, the transmissibility of the variants has increased. The transmissibility of the Omicron variant is higher than that of both the pre-Delta strains and the Delta variant, and is more difficult to suppress. These findings provide us with get a more clear and precise picture of the transmissibility of the different variants in the real world, in accordance with the findings of previous studies. R eff is more suitable than R t for assessing the transmissibility of the disease during an epidemic outbreak.

Keywords: Delta variant; Omicron variant; SARS-CoV-2; effective reproduction number; transmissibility; variant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of select outbreaks for fitting Reff and Rt value.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Epidemic curve COVID-19 transmitted locally in China from March 28, 2020 to March 1, 2022.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maximum Reff and Rt value of 9 pre-Delta strains outbreaks and 13 Delta variant outbreaks and 8 Omicron variant outbreaks. (A) Maximum Reff value. (B) Maximum Rt value.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Duration from the illness onset date to the diagnosed date (DID)/reported date (DIR) of all pre-Delta strains, Delta variant and Omicron variant outbreaks in China from March 28, 2020 to March 1, 2022. (A,C,E) DID of all pre-Delta strains, Delta variant and Omicron variant outbreaks, respectively. (B,D,F) DIR of all pre-Delta strains, Delta variant and Omicron variant outbreaks, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Duration of outbreak and total number of cases of all pre-Delta strains, Delta variant and Omicron variant outbreaks in China from March 28, 2020 to March 1, 2022. (A) Duration of outbreak. (B) Total number of cases.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. . A novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:727–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. . Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1054–62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feder K, Pearlowitz M, Goode A, Duwell M, Williams T, Chen-Carrington P, et al. . Linked clusters of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 - Maryland, January-February 2021. MMWR Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. (2021) 70:627–31. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7017a5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bal A, Destras G, Gaymard A, Stefic K, Marlet J, Eymieux S, et al. . Two-step strategy for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 and other variants with spike deletion H69-V70, France, August to December 2020. Euro Surveillance. (2021) 26:2100008. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2100008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annavajhala M, Mohri H, Wang P, Nair M, Zucker JE, Sheng Z, et al. . Emergence and expansion of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.526 after identification in New York. Nature. (2021) 597:703–708. 10.1038/s41586-021-03908-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts