Quantitative and qualitative surface analysis of three resin composites after polishing - An in vitro study
- PMID: 36187860
- PMCID: PMC9520642
- DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_225_22
Quantitative and qualitative surface analysis of three resin composites after polishing - An in vitro study
Abstract
Aim: The study aims to measure the surface roughness (Ra) of three resin composites subsequent to polishing with diamond-impregnated polishing paste.
Materials and methods: Sixty specimens (10 mm × 2 mm) were prepared in metal molds using three nanocomposites: GC Sculpt, Filtek Z350 XT, and Tetric N Ceram. Specimens were then subjected to baseline roughening with #600 grit sandpaper and were polished with DirectDia paste according to the manufacturer's instructions. After polishing, the Ra of resin composites of all the specimens was measured using profilometer and the surfaces were seen under scanning electron microscope.
Results: Tetric N Ceram specimens were significantly smoother and had the least Ra value compared to other groups.
Conclusion: Among the three resin composites tested, Tetric N Ceram exhibited the least Ra value owing to the small size of inorganic filler particles.
Keywords: Composite resin; profilometer; surface roughness.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007. PMID: 17877626
-
Effects of Finishing and Polishing Methods on the Surface Roughness and Surface Free Energy of Bulk-fill Resin Composites.Oper Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):E91-E104. doi: 10.2341/18-246-L. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Oper Dent. 2020. PMID: 31738697
-
The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jan 1;8(1):27-35. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007. PMID: 17211502
-
Surface geometry of various nanofiller composites using different polishing systems: A comparative study.J Conserv Dent. 2013 Nov;16(6):559-63. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.120949. J Conserv Dent. 2013. PMID: 24347894 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):203-11. Oper Dent. 2004. PMID: 15088733
Cited by
-
Surface roughness and microhardness evaluation of composite resin restorations subjected to three different polishing systems immediately and after 24 h: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Nov-Dec;26(6):639-645. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_106_23. Epub 2023 Nov 22. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023. PMID: 38292743 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mopper KW. Contouring, Finishing, and polishing posterior composites. Inside Dent. 2011;7:62–70.
-
- Antonson, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(Suppl 1):e 9–17. - PubMed
-
- Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple step polishing. Oper Dent. 2007;32:347–55. - PubMed
-
- Gedik R, Hurmuzulun F, Coskun A, Bektas O. Surface roughness of new Microhybrid resin based composite resin. Oper Dent. 2000;25:311–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous