Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022;4(1):213.
doi: 10.1007/s42399-022-01294-y. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

Negative Predictive Value of the Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV During the Predominance of Omicron over the Delta Variant and Implications in the Emergency Department

Affiliations
Editorial

Negative Predictive Value of the Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV During the Predominance of Omicron over the Delta Variant and Implications in the Emergency Department

Barbara Fyntanidou et al. SN Compr Clin Med. 2022.

Abstract

The high prevalence of asymptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic peaks and the common occurrence of in-hospital transmission urges the need for SARS-CoV-2 testing before admission of all patients with non-COVID-related symptoms. RT-PCR testing however is costly, time-consuming, and increases the length of stay in the emergency department. For the aforementioned reasons, we propose that the admission of non-suspected COVID-19 patients to the appropriate department should be based on the sole use of the rapid test result. In order to assess the safety of this suggestion, we assessed the negative predictive value of our rapid antigen tests that was calculated at 96.38%. This value was considered acceptable and the proposed strategy was applied in our hospital improving the overall turnaround times. However, since various rapid tests may perform differently, we propose that hospitals assess their own methodologies before implementing our proposal.

Keywords: COVID-19; Delta; Omicron; Rapid test; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Lucero A, Sokol K, Hyun J, et al. Worsening of emergency department length of stay during the COVID-19 pandemic. JACEP Open. 2021;2(3):e12489. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12489. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ugglas B, Skyttberg N, Wladis A, et al. Emergency department crowding and hospital transformation during COVID-19, a retrospective, descriptive study of a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00799-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(2):126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCusker J, Vadeboncoeur A, Levesque JF, et al. Increases in emergency department occupancy are associated with adverse 30-day outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(10):1092–1100. doi: 10.1111/acem.12480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, et al. Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types