Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
- PMID: 36188210
- PMCID: PMC9515562
- DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_7_22
Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
Abstract
Aim: To assess the chemical composition and oral biofilm formation on different types of commercially available clear orthodontic retainer materials (CORM).
Materials and methods: Four types of CORM commercially available were used (Clear advantage series I (CAS1), Clear advantage series II (CAS2), Endure (ES), and CENTRI FORM-clear rigid material (CFCRM)). Circular samples (12 mm diameter) of each CORM were prepared for (n = 40). Unstimulated saliva from twenty volunteers was collected. Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for the evaluation of the chemical composition of CORM. For the quantitative assessment of oral biofilm formation, samples of each CORM were incubated for twenty-four hours, and crystal violet assay (CVA) was utilized. The degree of absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 570 nm. For qualitative evaluation of oral formation, the samples of each CORM were incubated for 24 hours, and viable biofilm cells stained by acridine orange were examined under a fluorescent microscope.
Results: FTIR findings showed that CAS2 was made of polypropylene and ES is made of polyvinyl chloride, while others were made of co-polyester. CVA results confirmed that CAS2 showed the lowest biofilm formation, which differs significantly compared to CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. No significant difference in biofilm formation was detected between CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. Viable biofilm cells staining by acridine orange showed that CAS2 demonstrated smaller microcolonies of viable biofilm cells compared with CAS1, CFCRM, and ES, which confirmed the result obtained by CVA.
Conclusions: CAS2 showed anti-microbial activities with a decrease the in vitro biofilm formation, which may be related to its chemical composition.
Keywords: Acridine orange; Essex; clear orthodontic retainer materials; oral biofilm.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A distinct structure of Cas1-Cas2 complex provides insights into the mechanism for the longer spacer acquisition in Pyrococcus furiosus.Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Jul 31;183:379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.074. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021. PMID: 33864868
-
An In Vivo Study on the Development of Bacterial Microbiome on Clear Orthodontic Retainer.Dent J (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;10(12):239. doi: 10.3390/dj10120239. Dent J (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36547055 Free PMC article.
-
Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1-Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 27;114(26):E5122-E5128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618421114. Epub 2017 Jun 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 28611213 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation--a potential public health threat?Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Sep;18(7):1711-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1240-3. Epub 2014 Apr 13. Clin Oral Investig. 2014. PMID: 24728529 Review.
-
[Mechanism and risk factors of oral biofilm formation].Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2013 Aug 2;67:736-41. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1061393. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2013. PMID: 24018439 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus casei, and Candida Albicans on 5 thermoform and 3D printed orthodontic clear aligner and retainer materials at 3 time points: an in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04893-4. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39294648 Free PMC article.
-
The Development of a Measuring System for Intraoral SpO2.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;24(2):435. doi: 10.3390/s24020435. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38257528 Free PMC article.
-
Time-dependent microbiome dynamics in orthodontic thermoplastic materials: comparing PETG and TPU.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jul 8;29(8):374. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06441-y. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 40624404 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of light transmittance and color changes between polyurethane and copolyester retainer materials after staining and destaining.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03887-6. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38297268 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources