Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 4:3:813416.
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.813416. eCollection 2022.

Metacognitive Treatment in Acquired Brain Injury and Its Applicability to Aphasia: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Metacognitive Treatment in Acquired Brain Injury and Its Applicability to Aphasia: A Systematic Review

Amanda Wadams et al. Front Rehabil Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify the utility of metacognitive therapeutic intervention for persons with acquired brain injury (ABI), with a focus on persons with aphasia.

Methods: A search of six databases resulted in two hundred and sixty-six unique manuscripts relating to the explicit use of metacognitive treatment for people with ABI. Two independent reviewers rated abstracts for inclusion or exclusion of the study given predetermined criteria. Twenty-nine articles, five of which included people with aphasia, were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. SCED+ and PEDro+ rating scales were used to rate the methodological quality of each study.

Results: Methodological quality of the 29 studies that met inclusion criteria ranged from weak to high quality studies. Three -hundred and sixty-nine individuals with ABI took part in the 29 studies. Varying treatment methods were employed. Outcome measures were inconsistent. Metacognitive treatment has been applied to people with aphasia with positive results, but efficacy of the treatment cannot yet be determined.

Conclusions: Metacognitive therapeutic intervention tends to be effective for persons with acquired brain injury (ABI) despite variability between intervention designs and treatment outcomes across studies. Due to so few studies with participants with aphasia, we were unable to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of metacognitive treatment for people with aphasia. Further research on the efficacy of metacognitive treatment for this population is warranted.

Keywords: acquired brain injury; aphasia; metacognition; rehabilitation; systematic reveiw.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma flow diagram.

References

    1. Toglia J, Kirk U. Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury. Neurorehabilitation. (2000) 15:57–70. 10.3233/NRE-2000-15104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Desbois J, Strong J, Kuipers P. A metacognitive contextual intervention to enhance error awareness and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2006) 12:54–63. 10.1017/S135561770606005X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ownsworth T, Quinn H, Fleming J, Kendall M, Shum D. Error self-regulation following traumatic brain injury: a single case study evaluation of metacognitive skills training and behavioural practice interventions. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2010) 20:59–80. 10.1080/09602010902949223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sunderaraman P, Cosentino S. Integrating the constructs of anosognosia and metacognition: a review of recent findings in dementia. Curr Neurol Nerosci Rep. (2017) 17:27. 10.1007/s11910-017-0734-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazancieux A, Souchay C, Casez O, Moulin CJA. Metacognition and self-awareness in multiple sclerosis. Cortex. (2019) 3:238–55. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.012 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types