Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1:3:960473.
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.960473. eCollection 2022.

ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: Results of the icfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries

Sandra Kus  1   2   3 , Cornelia Oberhauser  1   2   3 , Stefan Simmel  4 , Michaela Coenen  1   2   3
Affiliations

ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: Results of the icfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries

Sandra Kus et al. Front Rehabil Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Physical aspects such as the type and severity of an injury are not the only factors contributing to whether or not a person can return to work (RTW) after a serious injury. A more comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach is needed to understand the complexity of RTW fully. The study aims to identify predictors of RTW 78 weeks after discharge from initial inpatient trauma rehabilitation in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries using a biopsychosocial perspective.

Methods: This is a prospective multicenter longitudinal study with a follow-up of up to 78 weeks after discharge from trauma rehabilitation. Data on potential predictors were collected at admission to rehabilitation using a comprehensive assessment tool. The status of RTW (yes vs. no) was assessed 78 weeks after discharge from rehabilitation. The data were randomly divided into a training and a validation data set in a ratio of 9:1. On the training data, we performed bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses on the association of RTW and potential predictors. The final logit model was selected via stepwise variable selection based on the Akaike information criterion. The final model was validated for the training and the validation data.

Results: Data from 761 patients (n = 561 male, 73.7%; mean age: 47.5 years, SD 12.3), primarily suffering from severe injuries to large joints and complex fractures of the large tubular bones, could be considered for analyses. At 78 weeks after discharge, 618 patients (81.2%) had returned to work. Eleven predictors remained in the final logit model: general health, current state of health, sensation of pain, limitations and restrictions in activities and participation (disability), professional sector, ongoing legal disputes, financial concerns (assets), personality traits, life satisfaction preaccident, attitude to life, and demand for pension claim. A predicted probability for RTW based on the multiple logistic regression model of 76.3% was revealed as the optimal cut-off score based on the ROC curve.

Conclusion: A holistic biopsychosocial approach is needed to address RTW and strengthen person-centered treatment and rehabilitation. Patients at risk for no RTW in the long term can already be identified at the onset of rehabilitation.

Keywords: Disability and Health (ICF); International Classification of Functioning; assessment; biopsychosocial; musculoskeletal injury; rehabilitation; return to work; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Project phases of icfPROreha.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of included and excluded patients and observations included in the analyses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Assignment of predictors to the biopsychosocial perspective of the ICF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curve (including AUC) and prediction accuracy on the training data for both cutoff scores [red: 76.3%, orange: 85.1%)].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Violence and injuries in Europe: burden, prevention and priorities for action: an analysis of the 2016 Who Global Health Estimates (2020).
    1. Statistisches Bundesamt. Unfälle, Gewalt, Selbstverletzung - Tabellenband - Ergebnisse Der Amtlichen Statistik Zum Verletzungsgeschehen 2019. Statistisches Bundesamt (2021).
    1. TraumaRegister DGU®. Jahresbericht 2021 - Traumaregister Dgu® Für Den Zeitraum Bis Ende 2020. Sektion Notfall- & Intensivmedizin & Schwerverletztenversorgungder Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V., AUC - Akademie der Unfallchirurgie GmbH (2021).
    1. Abedi M, Gane E, Aplin T, Zerguine H, Johnston V. Barriers and facilitators associated with return to work following minor to serious road traffic musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. (2022) 32(1):13–26. 10.1007/s10926-021-09994-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clay FJ, Fitzharris M, Kerr E, McClure RJ, Watson WL. The association of social functioning, social relationships and the receipt of compensation with time to return to work following unintentional injuries to Victorian workers. J Occup Rehabil. (2012) 22(3):363–75. 10.1007/s10926-012-9354-4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources