Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Dec;37(12):2435-2442.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4719. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Edward Czerwinski et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Abaloparatide significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and decreased risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical fractures compared with placebo. The Abaloparatide for the Treatment of Men with Osteoporosis (ATOM; NCT03512262) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide compared with placebo in men. Eligible men aged 40 to 85 years with osteoporosis were randomized 2:1 to daily subcutaneous injections of abaloparatide 80 μg or placebo for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD. Key secondary endpoints included BMD change from baseline at the total hip and femoral neck. A total of 228 men were randomized (abaloparatide, n = 149; placebo, n = 79). Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups (mean age, 68.3 years; mean lumbar spine BMD T-score, -2.1). At 12 months, BMD gains were greater with abaloparatide compared with placebo at the lumbar spine (least squares mean percentage change [standard error]: 8.48 [0.54] versus 1.17 [0.72]), total hip (2.14 [0.27] versus 0.01 [0.35]), and femoral neck (2.98 [0.34] versus 0.15 [0.45]) (all p < 0.0001). The most common (≥5%) treatment-emergent adverse events were injection site reaction, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, bronchitis, hypertension, and headache. During 12 months of abaloparatide treatment, men with osteoporosis exhibited rapid and significant improvements in BMD with a safety profile consistent with previous studies. These results suggest abaloparatide can be considered as an effective anabolic treatment option for men with osteoporosis. © 2022 Radius Health Inc and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Keywords: ABALOPARATIDE; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; FRACTURE; MEN; OSTEOPOROSIS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. SC = subcutaneously. The numbers shown are the planned subjects to be randomized.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant disposition. aIncludes individual reasons such as incorrectly injecting study medication, starting an osteoporosis medication outside of the trial, and termination from the study based on physician decision.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change from baseline in bone mineral density. (A) Lumbar spine. (B) Total hip. (C) Femoral neck. (D) One‐third radius. p < 0.01; *p ≤ 0.0001. BMD = bone mineral density; LSM = least squares mean; SE = standard error.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Median (±interquartile range) serum bone turnover marker levels. For s‐PINP, all p < 0.0001; for s‐CTX, p < 0.001 at months 3, 6, and 12. s‐CTX = serum carboxy‐terminal cross‐linking telopeptide of type I collagen; s‐PINP = serum procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide.

References

    1. Willson T, Nelson SD, Newbold J, Nelson RE, LaFleur J. The clinical epidemiology of male osteoporosis: a review of the recent literature. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:65‐76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Osteoporosis Foundation. The Man's Guide to Osteoporosis [Internet]. Accessed May 19, 2022. Available at: http://www.bonehealthandosteoporosis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mans...
    1. Burge R, Dawson‐Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis‐related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465‐475. - PubMed
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726‐1733. - PubMed
    1. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2521‐2531. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances