Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;9(11):e801-e808.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00226-0. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

Disseminating complex primary outcome results from a community-randomised trial to Zambian communities: lessons learned using a community dialogue approach in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial

Affiliations
Review

Disseminating complex primary outcome results from a community-randomised trial to Zambian communities: lessons learned using a community dialogue approach in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial

Musonda Simwinga et al. Lancet HIV. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

The HPTN 071 (PopART) trial of universal HIV testing and treatment to reduce HIV incidence was conducted in nine communities in South Africa and 12 in Zambia. The trial's primary outcome results were complicated to explain. Dissemination of these complicated results in participating communities in Zambia was done using a community dialogue approach. The approach, which involved interactive activities and a gradual and systematic approach to discussion of results in each community, facilitated respect and inclusion of participants in the dissemination process. The use of local language, pictures, images, and familiar analogies enhanced comprehension of the findings and created a two-way communication process between researchers and participants. The dialogue approach enabled both groups to use community perspectives, lived experiences, and local socio-structural features to interpret the trial results. Further, community members reflected on what the results meant to them individually and collectively. Although this community dialogue was both productive and appreciated, making this community interpretation apparent across disciplines in key quantitative scientific outputs remained a challenge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Process preceding dissemination meetings
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Dialogue process used to conduct dissemination meetings
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Example of illustration of the findings

References

    1. Ondenge K, McLellan-Lemal E, Awuonda E, Angira F, Mills L, Thomas T. Disseminating results: community response and input on Kisumu breastfeeding study. Translational behavioral medicine. 2015;5(2):207–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monnard K, Benjamins MR, Hirschtick JL, Castro M, Roesch PT. Co-creation of knowledge: A community-based approach to multilevel dissemination of health information. Health promotion practice. 2021;22(2):215–23. - PubMed
    1. Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. American journal of preventive medicine. 2010;39(4):372–8. - PubMed
    1. Minkler M Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior. 2004;31(6):684–97. - PubMed
    1. Smylie J, Kaplan-Myrth N, McShane K, Council MNoO-O, Pikwakanagan First Nation, Centre TIFR. Indigenous knowledge translation: Baseline findings in a qualitative study of the pathways of health knowledge in three indigenous communities in Canada. Health Promotion Practice. 2009;10(3):436–46. - PubMed

Publication types