Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov:126:104316.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104316. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

Relevant optical properties for gingiva-colored resin-based composites

Affiliations

Relevant optical properties for gingiva-colored resin-based composites

Cristina Lucena et al. J Dent. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the optical properties of gingiva-colored resin-based composites (GCRBCs).

Methods: Five discs (8 mm diameter x 1mm height) of 17 shades of GCRBCs were prepared. Diffuse reflectance was measured against white and black backgrounds using a calibrated spectroradiometer, CIE D65 illuminant and the CIE 45⁰/0⁰ geometry. Relative translucency parameter was calculated using ΔE00 (RTP00). Translucency differences were evaluated using published data of 50:50% translucency perceptibility (TPT00) and acceptability (TAT00) thresholds. Scattering (S) and absorption (K) coefficients and transmittance (T%) were calculated using Kubelka-Munk's equations. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney tests, and VAF coefficient.

Results: The RTP00 values of the 17 evaluated shades ranged from 8.69 to 21.34. There were perceptible translucency differences (TPT00=0.62) between different shades of the same brand and between composites designated with the same shade of different brands. Spectral distributions of S, K and T were wavelength-dependent. Although the spectral behavior of the S and K coefficients and T% were similar for all the gingival composites evaluated, the values of these parameters presented statistically significant differences between shades, which would justify the differences found in the relative translucency parameter.

Conclusions: The optical properties S, K and T% of GCRBCs were significantly different, resulting in perceptible translucency differences between the same shade of different commercial brands and between different shades of the same brand.

Clinical significance: Translucency differences of gingiva-colored composites may significantly influence their masking ability affecting the clinician's choice of restorative material.

Keywords: Absorption; Gingiva-colored resin-based composite; Scattering; Translucency; Transmittance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources