Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov;32(6):e2399.
doi: 10.1002/rmv.2399. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of human cytomegalovirus shedding in seropositive pregnant women

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of human cytomegalovirus shedding in seropositive pregnant women

Shari Sapuan et al. Rev Med Virol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

The detection of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in an individual's bodily fluid by culture techniques or through HCMV DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction, is known as HCMV shedding. Human cytomegalovirus shedding has the potential to transmit HCMV infection, where an individual can become infected with HCMV through contact with the bodily fluid of another individual containing HCMV. Human cytomegalovirus shedding can occur in primary infection and in non-primary infection for individuals with prior infection (HCMV seropositive). Human cytomegalovirus infection causes few or no symptoms in a pregnant woman, but can cause significant harm to her foetus if congenital CMV (cCMV) infection occurs. The association between HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women and the vertical transmission of HCMV to result in cCMV infection is poorly investigated, challenged by a limited understanding of the distribution of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women. We systematically reviewed the published literature to describe the prevalence of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive women during pregnancy up to delivery. This analysis identified nine studies that met our eligibility criteria. In these studies, the prevalence of HCMV shedding in any bodily fluid of HCMV seropositive women during pregnancy and at delivery ranged from 0% to 42.5%. A meta-analysis, performed on six of the nine studies with suitable sample sizes, estimated a pooled prevalence of 21.5% [95% CI 12.7%,30.3%]. To our knowledge, this is the first review to systematically search the literature to summarise the prevalence of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women. These estimates can help in the development of disease burden models and therapeutic or preventative strategies against cCMV infection in the context of non-primary maternal HCMV infection.

Keywords: cytomegalovirus; pregnant; prevalence; seropositive; shedding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of the identification of studies for the systematic review. Flow diagram of the identification of studies of the systematic review, adapted from PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for systematic review. Studies were identified according to the search strategy and inclusion criteria developed for the review from three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot displaying a random effects meta‐analysis of the prevalence of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) shedding in any bodily fluid of HCMV seropositive pregnant women on selected studies. Forest plot displaying a random effects meta‐analysis of the prevalence of CMV shedding in any bodily fluid of CMV seropositive pregnant women on selected studies with suitable sample size. Each square represents the prevalence for each study included in the meta‐analysis, placed in position to the corresponding study on the y‐axis and the corresponding prevalence estimate on the y‐axis. The pooled estimate prevalence is marked by a diamond. The length of the line on either side of each square and diamond represents the extent of the prevalence 95% CI. The prevalence estimate and 95% CI for each study and for the pooled estimate are also displayed on the far right, including Higgins I2 score for the pooled estimate displayed as I2 to analyse heterogeneity across the studies.

References

    1. Mocarski ES, Jr , Shenk T, Pass RF. Cytomegaloviruses. Fields’ Virol. 2007:2702‐2772.
    1. Saldan A, Forner G, Mengoli C, Gussetti N, Palù G, Abate D. Testing for cytomegalovirus in pregnancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(3):693‐702. 10.1128/jcm.01868-16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannon MJ, Hyde TB, Schmid DS. Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol. 2011;21(4):240‐255. 10.1002/rmv.695 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peckham CS, Chin KS, Coleman JC, Henderson K, Hurley R, Preece PM. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: preliminary findings from a prospective study. Lancet. 1983;1(8338):1352‐1355. 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92138-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Griffiths PD, Baboonian C, Rutter D, Peckham C. Congenital and maternal cytomegalovirus infections in a London population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98(2):135‐140. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13358.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types