Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30573.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030573.

Different patterns of esophageal motility disorders among patients with dysphagia and normal endoscopy: A 2-center experience

Affiliations

Different patterns of esophageal motility disorders among patients with dysphagia and normal endoscopy: A 2-center experience

Mariam S Zaghloul et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are the main etiology of nonobstructive dysphagia (NOD), but they are underestimated in Egypt. High-resolution manometry (HRM) with Chicago Classification version 3.0 (CC v3.0) is the current gold standard diagnostic modality to assess EMD in patients with NOD. In this HRM-based study, we aimed to classify EMD among Egyptian patients and explore the relationship between the severity of symptoms and the various groups of EMD. From January 2020 to January 2021, patients with dysphagia were subjected to diagnostic workup, which included symptom questionnaire for Eckardt score, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium esophagogram, and HRM. All patients were categorized based on the HRM results using CC version 3.0 after exclusion of those with obstructive esophageal lesions. Of 252 patients with dysphagia, 55 patients with NOD were analyzed according to CC version 3.0. Achalasia was diagnosed in 31 patients (56.4%) (type I: 18 [58.06%]; type II: 9 [29.03%], and type III: 4 [12.9%]), 3 patients (5.5%) with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, 2 patients (3.6%) with absent contractility, 4 patients (7.3%) with distal esophageal spasm, 7 patients (12.7%) with ineffective esophageal motility, and 8 patients (14.5%) with normal manometry. Patients with achalasia experienced significantly high regurgitation (96.8% vs 70.8%; P = .016) compared with those without achalasia. Achalasia was the most common EMD in Egyptian patients with NOD. Eckardt score was higher in patients with outflow obstruction and major motor disorder, but it could not differentiate different categories of CC of EMD. HRM is effective in characterization of EMD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Classification of patients with esophageal dysphagia based on their etiology.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Distribution of EMD in NOD patients according to Chicago Classification v3.0 by HRM. (B) Prevalence of different achalasia subtypes. EMD = esophageal motility disorder, HRM = high-resolution manometry, NOD = nonbstructive dysphagia.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison between achalasia and nonachalasia patients according to prevalence of the main presenting symptoms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [1]Tanaka Y Ihara E Nakamura K et al. . Clinical characteristics associated with esophageal motility function. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:1133–40. - PubMed
    1. [2]Zerbib F Omari T. Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:322–31. - PubMed
    1. [3]Roman S Kahrilas PJ. Challenges in the swallowing mechanism: nonobstructive dysphagia in the era of high-resolution manometry and impedance. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2011;40:823–35, ix. - PMC - PubMed
    1. [4]Gyawali CP Patel A. Esophageal motor function: technical aspects of manometry. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:527–43. - PubMed
    1. [5]Samo S Carlson DA Gregory DL Gawel SH Pandolfino JE Kahrilas PJ. Incidence and prevalence of achalasia in central Chicago, 2004-2014, since the widespread use of high-resolution manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:366–73. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms