How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory
- PMID: 36198506
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014695
How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory
Abstract
Background: Efforts to involve patients in patient safety continue to revolve around professionally derived notions of minimising clinical risk, yet evidence suggests that patients hold perspectives on patient safety that are distinct from clinicians and academics. This study aims to understand how hospital inpatients across three different specialties conceptualise patient safety and develop a conceptual model that reflects their perspectives.
Methods: A qualitative semi-structured interview study was conducted with 24 inpatients across three clinical specialties (medicine for the elderly, elective surgery and maternity) at a large central London teaching hospital. An abbreviated form of constructivist grounded theory was employed to analyse interview transcripts. Constant comparative analysis and memo-writing using the clustering technique were used to develop a model of how patients conceptualise patient safety.
Results: While some patients described patient safety using terms consistent with clinical/academic definitions, patients predominantly conceptualised patient safety in the context of what made them 'feel safe'. Patients' feelings of safety arose from a range of care experiences involving specific actors: hospital staff, the patient, their friends/family/carers, and the healthcare organisation. Four types of experiences contributed to how patients conceptualise safety: actions observed by patients; actions received by patients; actions performed by patients themselves; and shared actions involving patients and other actors in their care.
Conclusions: Our findings support the need for a patient safety paradigm that is meaningful to all stakeholders, incorporating what matters to patients to feel safe in hospital. Additional work should explore and test how the proposed conceptual model can be practically applied and implemented to incorporate the patient conceptualisation of patient safety into everyday clinical practice.
Keywords: Health services research; Hospital medicine; Patient safety; Qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Emotional safety is patient safety.BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jul;32(7):369-372. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015573. Epub 2023 Feb 2. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023. PMID: 36732064 No abstract available.
-
What the editor is reading: Quality improvement and patient safety.J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Apr;20(2):330-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.01.039. Epub 2024 Feb 29. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. PMID: 38453617 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical