Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Mar 1;108(3):833-842.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281342.

Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis

Silvia Mangiacavalli et al. Haematologica. .

Abstract

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In an attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd versus KRd was similar in terms of overall-response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, P=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, P=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.028). DaraRd was tolerated better, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, P<0.001). With the limitations of any retrospective analysis, our real-life PSM comparison between DaraRd and KRd, in first-relapse MM patients, showed better tolerability and prolonged PFS of DaraRd, although with some gaps of performance, in particular of DaraRd, with respect to RCT. Carfilzomib-containing regimens, like KRd, still remain a valid second-line option in the emerging scenario of first-line daratumumab-based therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patern of Rd-based triplet distribution overtime. Rd-based: lenalidomide plus dexamethasone-based.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Progression-free survival of patients treated with DaraRd versus KRd after cohort matching. DaraRd: daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; Krd: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Six-month landmark analysis of progression-free survival after cohort matching according to therapy received (DaraRd versus KRd) and response achieved. DaraRd: daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; Krd: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Overall survival of patients treated with DaraRd versus KRd afer cohort matching. DaraRd: daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; Krd: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046-1060. - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. . Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111(5):2516-2520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gulla A, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma: the (r)evolution of current therapy and a glance into future. Haematologica. 2020;105(10):2358-2367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harousseau JL, Attal M. How I treat first relapse of myeloma. Blood. 2017;130(8):963-973. - PubMed
    1. Kastritis E, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. How I treat relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2022;139(19):2904-2917. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms