Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;149(13):1667-1678.
doi: 10.1017/S0031182022001378. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Evolutionary consequences of vector-borne transmission: how using vectors shapes host, vector and pathogen evolution

Affiliations
Review

Evolutionary consequences of vector-borne transmission: how using vectors shapes host, vector and pathogen evolution

Daniela de Angeli Dutra et al. Parasitology. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Transmission mode is a key factor that influences host–parasite coevolution. Vector-borne pathogens are among the most important disease agents for humans and wildlife due to their broad distribution, high diversity, prevalence and lethality. They comprise some of the most important and widespread human pathogens, such as yellow fever, leishmania and malaria. Vector-borne parasites (in this review, those transmitted by blood-feeding Diptera) follow unique transmission routes towards their vertebrate hosts. Consequently, each part of this tri-partite (i.e. parasite, vector and host) interaction can influence co- and counter-evolutionary pressures among antagonists. This mode of transmission may favour the evolution of greater virulence to the vertebrate host; however, pathogen–vector interactions can also have a broad spectrum of fitness costs to the insect vector. To complete their life cycle, vector-borne pathogens must overcome immune responses from 2 unrelated organisms, since they can activate responses in both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, possibly creating a trade-off between investments against both types of immunity. Here, we assess how dipteran vector-borne transmission shapes the evolution of hosts, vectors and the pathogens themselves. Hosts, vectors and pathogens co-evolve together in a constant antagonistic arms race with each participant's primary goal being to maximize its performance and fitness.

Keywords: Coevolution; evolution; parasite–host interaction; vector ecology; vector-borne diseases; virulence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Illustration of the main selective pressures acting on hosts (A), vectors (B) and parasites (C), and examples of research questions that still lack answers (D). Figure created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Vector-borne pathogens and their vertebrate hosts and dipteran vectors transmitted in human-modified habitat. (1) Leishmania spp. infects humans via sandfly bites in (a) zoonotic cycles (using domestic dogs as the main reservoirs) and in (b) anthroponotic cycles (i.e. human-to-human transmission). (2) Dengue virus infects mostly humans and is vectored by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. (3) Human malaria parasites are transmitted among humans by Anopheles mosquitoes in residential and agricultural areas. (4) West Nile virus circulates among birds and is vectored by Culex mosquitoes and infects humans mainly in residential and in agricultural areas. (5) Spillover of pathogen from domestic to wildlife animals, here illustrated by the spillover of Plasmodium juxtanucleare from domestic chickens to wild birds (Ferreira-Junior et al., 2018). (6) Avian haemosporidian prevalence has been positively and/or negatively associated with anthropization depending on the parasite genera (e.g. Plasmodium or Haemoproteus), the type of anthropic impact (e.g. farming, urbanization, pollution, etc.) and the geographic region of the study (e.g. Neotropics, Europe, etc.). Urbanization and landscape modifications driven by human activities can have several environmental effects, such as increases in (A) temperature and (B) environmental pollution. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alizon S and van Baalen M (2008) Transmission-virulence trade-offs in vector-borne diseases. Theoretical Population Biology 74, 6–15. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson CT, Saili KS, Utzurrum RB and Jarvi SI (2013) Experimental evidence for evolved tolerance to avian malaria in a wild population of low elevation Hawai'i ‘amakihi (Hemignathus virens). EcoHealth 10, 366–375. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson CT, Utzurrum RB, Lapointe DA, Camp RJ, Crampton LH, Foster JT and Giambelluca TW (2014) Changing climate and the altitudinal range of avian malaria in the Hawaiian Islands – an ongoing conservation crisis on the island of Kaua'i. Global Change Biology 20, 2426–2436. - PubMed
    1. Auld SK and Tinsley MC (2015) The evolutionary ecology of complex lifecycle parasites: linking phenomena with mechanisms. Heredity 114, 125–132. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aželytė J, Wu-Chuang A, Žiegytė R, Platonova E, Mateos-Hernandez L, Maye J, Obregon D, Palinauskas V and Cabezas-Cruz A (2022) Anti-microbiota vaccine reduces avian malaria infection within mosquito vectors. Frontiers in Immunology 13, 841835. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.841835 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types