Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 26;88(20):e0119422.
doi: 10.1128/aem.01194-22. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Resistance of Cabbage Loopers to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Toxin Cry1F and to Dual-Bt Toxin WideStrike Cotton Plants

Affiliations

Resistance of Cabbage Loopers to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Toxin Cry1F and to Dual-Bt Toxin WideStrike Cotton Plants

Wendy Kain et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

The Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are major insecticidal toxins in formulated Bt sprays and are expressed in genetically engineered Bt crops for insect pest control. However, the widespread application of Bt toxins in the field imposes strong selection pressure on target insects, leading to the evolution of insect resistance to the Bt toxins. Identification and understanding of mechanisms of insect resistance to Bt toxins are an important approach for dissecting the modes of action of Bt toxins and providing knowledge necessary for the development of resistance management technologies. In this study, cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) strains resistant to the transgenic dual-Bt toxin WideStrike cotton plants, which express Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1F, were selected from T. ni strains resistant to the Bt formulation Bt-DiPel. The WideStrike-resistant T. ni larvae were confirmed to be resistant to both Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1F. From the WideStrike-resistant T. ni, the Cry1F resistance trait was further isolated to establish a T. ni strain resistant to Cry1F only. The levels of Cry1F resistance in the WideStrike-resistant and the Cry1F-resistant strains were determined, and the inheritance of the Cry1F-resistant trait in the two strains was characterized. Genetic association analysis of the Cry1F resistance trait indicated that the Cry1F resistance in T. ni isolated in this study is not shared with the Cry1Ac resistance mechanism nor is it associated with a mutation in the ABCC2 gene, as has so far been reported in Cry1F-resistant insects. IMPORTANCE Insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are highly effective for insect control in agriculture. However, the widespread application of Bt toxins exerts strong selection for Bt resistance in insect populations. The continuing success of Bt biotechnology for pest control requires the identification of resistance and understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to Bt toxins. Cry1F is an important Bt toxin used in transgenic cotton, maize, and soybean varieties adopted widely for insect control. To understand the mode of action of Cry1F and mechanisms of Cry1F resistance in insects, it is important to identify Cry1F-specific resistance and the resistance mechanisms. In this study, Trichoplusia ni strains resistant to commercial "WideStrike" cotton plants that express Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1F were selected, and a Cry1F-specific resistant strain was isolated. The isolation of the novel Cry1F-specific resistance in the T. ni provided an invaluable biological system to discover a Cry1F-specific novel resistance mechanism.

Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis; Bt resistance; Bt toxins; Cry1Ac; Cry1F; Trichoplusia ni.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Genotyping of the ABCC2 gene in T. ni from the Cornell strain (1 and 2), GLEN-Cry1Ac-R (3 and 4), GLEN-WideStrike-R (5 and 6), and GLEN-Cry1F-R (7 and 8) by PCR analysis. The Cry1Ac-susceptible allele was shown as a 120-bp fragment (MZ571761), and the Cry1Ac-resistant allele was shown as a 102-bp fragment (MZ571762). M, molecular size markers.
FIG 2
FIG 2
SDS-PAGE analysis of midgut BBMV proteins from individual T. ni 5th instar larvae from the Cornell strain (1 and 2), GLEN-Cry1Ac-R (3 and 4), GLEN-WideStrike-R (5 and 6), and GLEN-Cry1F-R (7 and 8). Arrows indicate the 110-kDa APN1 protein band. MW, molecular weight markers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806. doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.3.775-806.1998. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crickmore N, Berry C, Panneerselvam S, Mishra R, Connor TR, Bonning BC. 2021. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol 186:107438. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2020.107438. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nester E, Thomashow LS, Metz M, Gordon M. 2002. 100 years of Bacillus thuringiensis: a critical scientific assessment. American Academy of Microbiology, Washington, DC. - PubMed
    1. Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS. 2015. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. J Invertebr Pathol 132:1–41. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill SS, Soberon M. 2011. Bacillus thuringiensis: a story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41:423–31431. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.02.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources