Comparing the VITEK 2 ANC card, species-specific PCR, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry methods for identification of lactic acid bacteria
- PMID: 36201398
- DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16343
Comparing the VITEK 2 ANC card, species-specific PCR, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry methods for identification of lactic acid bacteria
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are not only the most common probiotics in the food and feed industry but are also used as plant probiotics. Therefore, precise identification of LAB at the species level is required. In this study, we compared three different methods, the VITEK 2 ANC card, species-specific PCR, and MALDI-TOF MS, to identify six LAB (Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lentilactobacillus buchneri, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum) species previously assigned to the genus Lactobacillus that are used as biofertilizers. Twenty-two strains of six LAB species were analyzed using the VITEK 2 ANC card, species-specific PCR, and MALDI-TOF MS, and identification rates at the species level were 45.5%, 95.5%, and 95.5%, respectively. There were cross-reactions between L. casei and L. parpacasei, and one strain of L. casei could not be identified by these three methods. PCR assays and MALDI-TOF MS were applicable for LAB identification. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: LAB are the most common probiotics in the food and feed industry, so precise identification and classification of LAB at the species level are required. This study aimed at comparing three different methods for the effective identification of six LAB species: biochemical testing using VITEK 2 ANC card, species-specific PCR, and MALDI-TOF MS analysis.
Keywords: MALDI-TOF MS; VITEK; identification; lactic acid bacteria; species-specific PCR.
© 2022 Institute of Food Technologists.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Axelsson, L. (2004). Lactic acid bacteria: Classification and physiology. In S. Salminen & A. von Wright (Eds.), Lactic acid bacteria: Microbiological and functional aspects (3rd ed., pp. 1-66). Marcel dekker Inc.
-
- Buszewski, B., Rogowska, A., Pomastowski, P., Złoch, M., & Railean-Plugaru, V. (2017). Identification of microorganisms by modern analytical techniques. Journal of AOAC International, 100(6), 1607-1623. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.17-0207
-
- Costa, G. N., Vilas-Bôas, G. T., Vilas-Boas, L. A., & Miglioranza, L. H. S. (2011). In silico phylogenetic analysis of lactic acid bacteria and new primer set for identification of Lactobacillus plantarum in food samples. European Food Research and Technology, 233(2), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1508-7
-
- Dellaglio, F., Felis, G. E., & Torriani, S. (2002). The status of the species Lactobacillus casei (Orla-Jensen 1916) Hansen and Lessel 1971 and Lactobacillus paracasei Collins et al. 1989. Request for an Opinion. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 52, 285-287.
-
- Dubernet, S., Desmasures, N., & Gueguen, M. (2002). A PCR-based method for identification of lactobacilli at the genus level. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 214(2), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11358.x
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous