Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;140(5):784-792.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004921. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

Patterns in Contraceptive Use Among Women of Mexican Origin in the United States and in Mexico

Affiliations

Patterns in Contraceptive Use Among Women of Mexican Origin in the United States and in Mexico

Kate Coleman-Minahan et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine current contraceptive use by parity among four ethnicity and nativity groups: non-Latina White women in the United States, Mexican-American women in the United States, foreign-born women of Mexican origin in the United States, and Mexican women in Mexico.

Methods: We combined nationally representative data from sexually active women, aged 15-44 years, and not seeking pregnancy from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth and the Mexican National Survey of Demographic Dynamics. This is a secondary binational analysis. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the prevalence of moderately or most effective contraceptive method use (compared with least effective or no contraceptive method) by ethnicity and nativity and tested the interaction between ethnicity and nativity and parity.

Results: Compared with non-Latina White women, women of Mexican origin had lower odds of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] Mexican-American women: 0.69 [0.54-0.87]; foreign-born women: 0.67 [0.48-0.95]; Mexican women in Mexico: 0.59 [0.40-0.87]). Among parous women, the adjusted probability of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method was approximately 65% among all four groups. Contraceptive method use did not differ by parity among non-Latina White women. However, parous Mexican-American women were 1.5 times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods than nulliparous Mexican-American women (adjusted probability 66.1% vs 42.7%). Parous foreign-born women were 1.8 times more likely to use most or moderately effective contraceptive methods than their nulliparous counterparts (64.5% vs 36.0%), and parous Mexican women in Mexico were three times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods (65.2% vs 21.5%).

Conclusion: Findings suggest that access to effective contraception is limited outside the context of childbearing for women of Mexican origin in the United States and, to an even larger extent, in Mexico.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Blair G. Darney's institution receives funding from Organon for projects on which she is the Principal Investigator. She is a co-investigator on an NIH R01 and AHRQ R01 and serves on the Board of Directors of the Society of Family Planning (SFP) (unpaid) and the Board of CISIDAT (Health Research Consortium), Mexico (unpaid). The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Distribution of contraceptive method groups within each parity group, by ethnicity and nativity group. Estimates are weighted with complex survey weights. Non-Latina White (A), Mexican-American (B), foreign-born (C), and Mexican (D). IUD, intrauterine device.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Adjusted predicted probability of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method (vs least effective or no contraceptive method) from multivariable logistic regression model, with an interaction between ethnicity and nativity group and parity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beshar I, So J, Chelvakumar M, Cahill EP, Shaw KA, Shaw JG. Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017. Contraception 2021;103:246–54. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018;97:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kavanaugh ML, Pliskin E. Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016. F S Rep 2020;1:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United States Census Bureau. 2019 population estimates by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin. Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2020/population-estimates-det...
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. Profile: Hispanic/Latino Americans. Accessed September 8, 2021. https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=3&lvlid=64

Publication types

Substances