Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov:122:106953.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106953. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

Economic analysis of a single institutional review board data exchange standard in multisite clinical studies

Eric L Eisenstein  1 , Anita Walden  2 , Katrina Donovan  3 , Meredith N Zozus  4 , Feliciano B Yu Jr  5 , Vivian L West  6 , W Ed Hammond  7 , Lawrence H Muhlbaier  8
Affiliations

Economic analysis of a single institutional review board data exchange standard in multisite clinical studies

Eric L Eisenstein et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Single Institutional Review Boards (sIRB) are not achieving the benefits envisioned by the National Institutes of Health. The recently published Health Level Seven (HL7®) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®) data exchange standard seeks to improve sIRB operational efficiency.

Methods and results: We conducted a study to determine whether the use of this standard would be economically attractive for sIRB workflows collectively and for Reviewing and Relying institutions. We examined four sIRB-associated workflows at a single institution: (1) Initial Study Protocol Application, (2) Site Addition for an Approved sIRB study, (3) Continuing Review, and (4) Medical and Non-Medical Event Reporting. Task-level information identified personnel roles and their associated hour requirements for completion. Tasks that would be eliminated by the data exchange standard were identified. Personnel costs were estimated using annual salaries by role. No tasks would be eliminated in the Initial Study Protocol Application or Medical and Non-Medical Event Reporting workflows through use of the proposed data exchange standard. Site Addition workflow hours would be reduced by 2.50 h per site (from 15.50 to 13.00 h) and Continuing Review hours would be reduced by 9.00 h per site per study year (from 36.50 to 27.50 h). Associated costs savings were $251 for the Site Addition workflow (from $1609 to $1358) and $1033 for the Continuing Review workflow (from $4110 to $3076).

Conclusion: Use of the proposed HL7 FHIR® data exchange standard would be economically attractive for sIRB workflows collectively and for each entity participating in the new workflows.

Keywords: Cost analysis; Data exchange; HL7 FHIR; Single institutional review board; Workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
sIRB Workflow Descriptions
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
sIRB Workflow Descriptions
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
sIRB Workflow Descriptions
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
sIRB Workflow Descriptions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Flynn KE, Hahn CL, Kramer JM, et al. Using central IRBs for multicenter clinical trials in the United States. PLoS One 2013;(1):e e54999.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054999. Epub 2013 Jan 30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), IRB Reliance: A New Model for Accelerating Translational Science. Available from https://ncats.nih.gov/pubs/features/irb-reliance. Accessed May 8, 2017.
    1. Klitzman R The Ethics Police? The Struggle to Make Human Research Safe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Menikoff J, The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review. N Engl J Med. 2010. Oct 21;363(17):1591–3. - PubMed
    1. Krafcik BM, Doros G, Malikova MA. A single center analysis of factors influencing study start-up times in clinical trials. Future Sci OA 2007. Jul 14;3(4):FSO223. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types