Predictive worth of estimated glucose disposal rate: evaluation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and non-diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMID: 36203208
- PMCID: PMC9535978
- DOI: 10.1186/s13098-022-00915-9
Predictive worth of estimated glucose disposal rate: evaluation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and non-diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Background: Measurement of estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) has been demonstrated to be an indicator of insulin resistance (IR) and a risk sign for long-term outcomes in those with ischemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) having coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the usefulness of eGDR for prognosis in those with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and non-diabetes is yet unknown.
Methods: 1510 NSTE-ACS patients with non-diabetes who underwent elective PCI in 2015 (Beijing Anzhen Hospital) were included in this study. Major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCEs), such as all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and also ischemia-driven revascularization, were the main outcome of follow-up. The average number of follow-up months was 41.84.
Results: After multivariate Cox regression tests with confounder adjustment, the occurrence of MACCE in the lower eGDR cluster was considerably higher than in the higher eGDR cluster, demonstrating that eGDR is an independent prognostic indicator of MACCEs. In particular, as continuous variate: hazard ratio (HR) of 1.337, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.201-1.488, P < 0.001. eGDR improves the predictive power of usual cardiovascular risk factors for the primary endpoint. Specifically, the results for the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, this is AUC, were: baseline model + eGDR 0.699 vs. baseline model 0.588; P for contrast < 0.001; continuous net reclassification improvement (continuous-NRI) = 0.089, P < 0.001; and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) = 0.017, P < 0.001.
Conclusion: Low eGDR levels showed a strong correlation with poor NSTE-ACS prognosis for nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI.
Keywords: Estimated glucose disposal rate; Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome; Non-diabetes; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Prognosis.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Prognostic Value of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401002. eCollection 2023 Jan. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39076873 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between estimated glucose disposal rate and in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention in individuals with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 14;13:1033354. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1033354. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36452320 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic implication of serum glycated albumin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Jan 19;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01446-3. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022. PMID: 35045846 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Disease.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Oct;47(10):101306. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101306. Epub 2022 Jul 8. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35810843 Review.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 24;12(1):5138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09158-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35332253 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predictive value of glucose coefficient of variation for in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI: Insights from the MIMIC-IV database.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Oct 26;23:200347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200347. eCollection 2024 Dec. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024. PMID: 39524973 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between estimated glucose disposal rate and diabetic depression: a population-based study.Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 25;16:1507280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1507280. eCollection 2025. Front Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40201064 Free PMC article.
-
The role of cardiovascular disease in the association between estimated glucose disposal rate and chronic kidney disease.Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00359-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40341196 Free PMC article.
-
Insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases incidence: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Sep 28;23(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02437-2. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 39342205 Free PMC article.
-
Insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate and risk of incident cardiovascular diseases among individuals without diabetes: findings from a nationwide, population based, prospective cohort study.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02256-5. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 38844981 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Meigs JB, et al. Insulin resistance as estimated by homeostasis model assessment predicts incident symptomatic cardiovascular disease in caucasian subjects from the general population: the Bruneck study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(2):318–324. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0919. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous