Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;27(1):12-20.
doi: 10.1111/hdi.13047. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Systematic review of locking solutions for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters

Affiliations

Systematic review of locking solutions for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters

Isabelle Boucley et al. Hemodial Int. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating lock solutions for use in non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases from inception to June 11, 2021. Study inclusion criteria were: randomized trial or observational study, adults (>18 years), with acute kidney injury (AKI); and temporary non-tunneled catheters. We recorded bleeding events, catheter dysfunction and complications.

Results: Of 649 studies identified, 6 were included (4 randomized, 1 non-randomized trial, 1 retrospective cohort study; sample sizes 78-1496 patients). Citrate was compared to heparin in 4 studies, to saline in 1, and ethanol versus saline in 1. Event-free survival of non-tunneled catheters did not differ between groups. Catheter-related infections and adverse events were less frequent with citrate locks, but reached statistical significance in only two studies.

Conclusion: Existing data are too heterogeneous to enable recommending one type of catheter lock over any other for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters.

Keywords: intensive care unit; locking solutions; non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No author has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of the selection of studies for inclusion in the review [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Clec'h C, Gonzalez F, Lautrette A, Nguile‐Makao M, Garrouste‐Orgeas M, Jamali S, et al. Multiple‐center evaluation of mortality associated with acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a competing risks analysis. Crit Care. 2011;15:R128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiffl H, Lang SM, Fischer R. Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:305–10. - PubMed
    1. Investigators RRTS , Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, et al. Intensity of continuous renal‐replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1627–38. - PubMed
    1. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33. - PubMed
    1. Siempos II, Kopterides P, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Armaganidis AE. Impact of catheter‐related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta‐analysis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2283–9. - PubMed

Publication types