Perioperative outcomes of emergency and elective colorectal surgery: a bi-institutional study
- PMID: 36203389
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.18091
Perioperative outcomes of emergency and elective colorectal surgery: a bi-institutional study
Abstract
Background: Emergency colorectal surgery tends to be associated with poorer outcomes compared to elective colorectal surgery. This study assessed the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency and elective colorectal resection in two metropolitan hospitals.
Methods: Patients were identified retrospectively from two institutions between April 2018 and July 2020. Baseline, operative and postoperative parameters were collected for comparative analysis between emergency and elective surgery groups. A binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications.
Results: During the study period, 454 patients underwent colorectal resection, 135 were emergency cases (29.74%) and 319 were elective cases (70.26%). Compared with elective resections, patients undergoing emergency resections were observed to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV (53.33% vs. 38.56%) (P = 0.004). The mortality rate was similar between the emergency and elective group (1.48% vs. 0.63%, P = 0.369). The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency resections (64.44% vs. 36.68%, P < 0.001), but the major complication rate was similar between groups (12.59% vs. 10.34%, P = 0.484). Independent predictors for postoperative complications included emergency surgery (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.77, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.66 to 4.61) and an ASA Score of III to IV (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.84 to 4.47).
Conclusion: The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection, however, rates of major complications and mortality were similar between groups. Higher complication rates reflect advanced disease pathology in patients who are more comorbid.
Keywords: colectomy; colorectal surgery; emergency surgery; morbidity; mortality.
© 2022 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Raval MV, Ko CY, Nathens AB. Comparison of hospital performance in emergency versus elective general surgery operations at 198 hospitals. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011; 212: 20-8.e1.
-
- Hernandez MC, Madbak F, Parikh K, Crandall M. GI surgical emergencies: scope and burden of disease. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019; 23: 827-36.
-
- Kim J, Mittal R, Konyalian V, King J, Stamos MJ, Kumar RR. Outcome analysis of patients undergoing colorectal resection for emergent and elective indications. Am. Surg. 2007; 73: 991-3.
-
- Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78: 306-11.
-
- Skala K, Gervaz P, Buchs N et al. Risk factors for mortality-morbidity after emergency-urgent colorectal surgery. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2009; 24: 311-6.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous